I did a double take because the composition is so stark and forceful, it reminds me of soviet posters. Great shot.
Photography
c/photography is a community centered on the practice of amateur and professional photography. You can come here to discuss the gear, the technique and the culture related to the art of photography. You can also share your work, appreciate the others' and constructively critique each others work.
Please, be sure to read the rules before posting.
THE RULES
- Be nice to each other
This Lemmy Community is open to civil, friendly discussion about our common interest, photography. Excessively rude, mean, unfriendly, or hostile conduct is not permitted.
- Keep content on topic
All discussion threads must be photography related such as latest gear or art news, gear acquisition advices, photography related questions, etc...
- No politics or religion
This Lemmy Community is about photography and discussion around photography, not religion or politics.
- No classified ads or job offers
All is in the title. This is a casual discussion community.
- No spam or self-promotion
One post, one photo in the limit of 3 pictures in a 24 hours timespan. Do not flood the community with your pictures. Be patient, select your best work, and enjoy.
-
If you want contructive critiques, use [Critique Wanted] in your title.
-
Flair NSFW posts (nudity, gore, ...)
-
Do not share your portfolio (instagram, flickr, or else...)
The aim of this community is to invite everyone to discuss around your photography. If you drop everything with one link, this become pointless. Portfolio posts will be deleted. You can however share your portfolio link in the comment section if another member wants to see more of your work.
Good photo!
It's hard to say at that resolution and compression, but it seems overcooked to me. The red sweater certainly is too red, the rest of the photo (especially the sky, wall and ground) seems to lack detail and be oversaturated.
There's like a vertical line towards the left (look above the woman's right hand) - was this scanned (from film or print)?
*(the rest has nothing to do with photography: apologies for that) *
About the message, I must say that the only way nato=nazi can hold any sense is if you intend "nazi" as a generic slur... like saying nato=shit, where you don't intend literal excrement but use the word "shit" to convey meaning similar to "disgusting" or "despicable" (that is, if you have any idea who nazi were and what nato is, which I'm sure you actually do).
The problem with that is that using a word like a generic slur devoids it of its meaning, which is not what we want to do to the name of one of the worst human-made abominations in recent history, whose memory we ~~want~~ need to preserve as a reminder of what we did, and a warning of what we might again do.
Also, with all the authoritarian regimes that are in power and the actual genocides that are in progress right now, it seems questionable to associate nazism with, of all things, nato (yeah, they are both four letters and start in "na", which is... an extremely shallow reason).
NATO is a millitary alliance of imperialist countries, whose leading officers have often been high-ranking Nazis, such as Adolf Heusinger. The comparisons to the Nazis are apt.
nato=nazi
It literally does. It was founded by Nazis and the people that inspired them. The same people who helped tens of thousands of Nazi to escape any consequences of there participation in the holocaust and is arming, funding, and shielding the country committing a second Holocaust as we speak.
@jankforlife A pretty weak photo if you’re trying to publish anti western propaganda. On this photo the swastika’s reversed, and not at 45 degrees. You’ve currently depicted a Hindi symbol of great spiritual value.