17
Foreign tourists could be charged to visit UK museums - including top London sites
(www.standard.co.uk)
It is all stolen stuff, or almost.
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
17 points (94.7% liked)
United Kingdom
6608 readers
291 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
James Acaster:
That's why the British Museum is so busy, no British people ever go in there, it's just people from abroad looking at their own stuff...
What a shower of bastards.
Why's that?
Public culture shouldn't be accessible to only those with means. Someone's country of origin has no bearing on that.
Half of the exhibits in these museums are of foreign origin as well, stolen during imperialism. So charging foreigners to see stolen items that could very well be from their own country is again ridiculous.
Thirdly, how many museums and art galleries have you been to that are clearly struggling for cash? I've been to many, and 9 times out of 10 they're in exquisite condition. Money isn't the fix for everything. Charging to enter museums could even backfire and result in a reduction in footfall and therefore donations.
I'm sure Baroness Margaret Hodge knows all about keeping culture afloat for the public good though and only has the public's best interests at heart...
The family moved to Orpington, Kent (present-day Greater London), where they started their family-owned steel-trading corporation, Stemcor.[7] It is now one of the world's largest privately held steel companies, with an annual turnover of over £6 billion in 2011.[8] Hodge is a major shareholder
She went on to study at the London School of Economics, graduating in 1966 with a third-class honours degree in government studies.[12] After working briefly on television political programmes, she began, but did not complete, a master's degree in philosophy at Bedford College, London.[13]
In 2015 there was considerable controversy about her benefiting, to the tune of £1.5 million, from assets repatriated from a Liechtenstein family trust in 2011 using the Liechtenstein disclosure facility, that reduced penalties and removed the risk of prosecution for Britons moving undeclared assets back to the UK. Coverage focused on the apparent hypocrisy in her condemnation of the use of tax havens.
I can see the flood of social media posts now: "I was born in the UK but was denied free entry because I looked foreign"
Why is the government obsessed with trying to wrack up as much bad PR as possible at the moment?
Sigh.
Maybe we should refrain from these kind of comments until we cross that bridge? The initiative seems perfectly neutral.
seems perfectly neutral
I'm pretty confident that making something free now cost money is a universally disliked thing.
we should refrain from these kind of comments until we cross that bridge
Respectfully, before a proposed change is enacted is the perfect time for comments pointing out its flaws or the issues that may arise. It's why it's a proposed change and not already in effect.