Religion is not based on the premise of falsifiability. Science is.
Ask Science
Ask a science question, get a science answer.
Community Rules
Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.
Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.
Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.
Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.
Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.
Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.
Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.
Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.
Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.
Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.
Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.
Rule 7: Report violations.
Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.
Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.
Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.
Rule 9: Source required for answers.
Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.
By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.
We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.
But that's just a theory. A string theory.
What
No. Religion is based on belief. Science is based on observation and experimentation. They're completely exclusive of each other.
Which is not to say a scientist can't be religious. Greek philosophers observed the stars and the planets but still had plenty of religious beliefs about them.
Can’t we mix in one stupid thing and call it faith though?
Noooooo, I’m not advocating a system of malleable knowledge based on observation and experimentation. I just happen to believe in the invisible sea fairy who commands me to accept science.
It's not a religion.
It's just called "Science"
I call it "membership in the reality-based community, rather than the faith-based one"
Not really. Religion is pretty universally built on certainty. Science is entirely best current ideas and more questions.