this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
561 points (99.1% liked)

me_irl

7675 readers
2178 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] joostjakob@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

And then the baby is forced into bankruptcy because Q4 results were below expectations

[–] III@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Father is given 500 million golden parachute and retires to his 19th yacht.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's just the reality of exponential, compound growth. But of course no society would ever think such growth could be sustained permanently...

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 29 points 1 day ago

basing one's economy off of infinite growth? ahahaha no one would ever do that

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

xkcd made notice of the same issue with weddings!

[–] JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Shouldn't this take into account that all the hundreds of days prior to yesterday she also had zero husbands, so at that slow of increase, things should remain steady for a long while.

[–] FoxyGrandpa@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] krellor@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago

This, of course, is a ridiculous extrapolation. By focusing on the rate of change (doubling) every three months we of course get an absurd result.

Instead, if we simply extrapolate the absolute growth per unit time then assuming the baby went from 10 lbs at birth to 20 lbs at three months (doubling), and we have 40 such time units until age 10, then we get a much more reasonable expected growth to 400 lbs. Which of course is much more reasonable for a 10 year old. Totally reasonable.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

I love statistics.

Working backwards: 7,500,000,000,000 pounds / 2^[(4 three-month periods per year)*(10 years)] = 6.8lb baby