this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
2 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

9817 readers
19 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/52903710

Since Microsoft owns Github, Gitlab is Corp owned now since 2022, why are so many who preach privacy or using Linux, etc, still using a MS product?

Genuine questions. I'm assumming either familiarity & simplicity with GH or difficulty migrating elsewhere?

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uenticx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We've been happy with gitea, argocd and openproject. After 8 years in a vendor locked EKS situation from all angles, I would never go back.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

Because there hasn’t been enough discomfort to disrupt established workflows yet.

I remember when Sourceforge hit that tipping point. Microsoft and Gitlab likely do too.

[–] 5ymm3trY@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 4 days ago

I am not really the target of your question, because I am not a developer of something in particular. I mainly use git to backup and track my Linux and Docker config. There are a few unfinished side-projects as well, but nothing really interesting. I personally chose Gitlab over Codeberg mainly because of the ability to create private repos. The repos don't contain any private info but I don't saw any real benefit for the general public either. However, this decision was a couple of years ago.

As of late, I want to use git also for other stuff that potentially contains data I am not willing to share. Therefore I want to setup my personal Forgejo instance. I like the idea of Codeberg. My goal is to host everything I really want to keep private on my personal instance and move everything else to Codeberg.