LinkedinLunatics

6842 readers

4 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

csm10495@sh.itjust.works

crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz

The companies that don't allow you to use AI! (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 week ago by zarkanian@sh.itjust.works to c/linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Damn. Companies that haven’t embraced AI? Where does one find those?

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 1 week ago

IDK about companies that haven't embraced AI, but I know of several companies that have already been burned by AI and abandoned it.

[–] Master@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I work in architecture and its pretty much banned except for rewriting emails to sound less angry.

You are allowed to use it... but everything gets reviewed multiple times for code compliance and safety and, "the ai wrote it that way" is not an excuse that will prevent you from being fired... in fact its more likely to escalate a minor incident because you missed something to a major incident because you didnt even do your job.

[–] plateee@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seriously, that's horrible that some companies haven't gargled the balls of Anthropic and OpenAI. Just terrible. Who are these companies so I can totally avoid accidentally sending them my resume?

[–] Maroon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I doubt you'd find big companies doing this. On the other hand, a lot of smaller / medium size companies focusing on specific skills and services are surprisingly anti AI. I came across this site (typescholar.com) last month, where they straight-up declare they won't use AI.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

"Pilot programs that got killed by compliance" = "some slopgen bullshit that broke all kinds of security BPs"

Good luck to them, they're gonna need it

[–] shirasho@feddit.online 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are we not discussing the last comment? The AI projects got killed by compliance, meaning they were a security or legal concern. This guy thinks these people should be scooped up and elevated.

AI tech bros are just asking for failure. They are gambling on unproven technology and calling it the next coming of Christ. If they were right, they will make just as much money as any other non-ai company. If they are wrong they lose their entire company and their business model, and they lose employees who k ow how to solve critical problems when their unmonitored and liability free robot goes rogue. The pros do not outweigh the cons.

[–] ZebulonP@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Never interrupt your opponent while he is in the middle of making a mistake.