this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

84731 readers
3373 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ReCursing@feddit.uk 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The article, as usual, makes no comparison to the environmental impact of companies like McDonalds (who use PER DAY what every AI data centre combined in the world uses PER YEAR, not companies like Shell or BP who are orders of magnitude worse than that. This is the usual anti-ai fear-mongering bollocks.

Should Google have installed it unasked? No, that's bullshit, possibly illegal bullshit but honestly considering how disingenuous the environmental impact is I can't trust the legal stuff that I don't know about either. But it is not an environmental catastrophe as whoever wrote this article would like you to believe for some reason.

Honest question: why are the haters pushing their nonsense? What do they have to gain?

edit: As usually the haters and useful idiots provide nonsense counterpoints and downvote because they don't have laugh reacts to demonstrate their groupthink and wilful ignorance. I really wish they'd all shut the hell up, they're annoying!

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, some whataboutism. Great.

Also great to know you don't have to pay to get storage in your devices, otherwise you'd be quite unhappy to see it taken out of your control for no feature (Chrome still relies on cloud services for most AI features).

[–] ReCursing@feddit.uk 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't even know what you're getting at here. You claim my comment, which points out how disingenuous the article is, is whataboutism, then provide some whataboutism.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Article talk about pushing a large model on people's computer. You minimize this by going about McDonalds, Shell, BP. Do you even know what "whataboutism" mean? Your first sentence is "what about McDonald, Shell, BP".

[–] ReCursing@feddit.uk -1 points 1 week ago

I'm calling out how stupidly and obviously disingenuous the article is. That's not whataboutism. Do you know what disingenuous means? The article claims it has a huge environmental impact. It doesn't.

[–] Jack@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Remove and prevent 4 GB Gemini nano install into Chrome, on Windows 11:

  1. Start
  2. regedit
  3. Backup registry by exporting it
  4. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies
  5. right-click Policies, New, Key
  6. Google
  7. right-click Google, New, Key
  8. Chrome
  9. right-click Chrome, New, DWORD (32-bit) Value
  10. GenAILocalFoundationalModelSettings
  11. right-click newly created key, Modify
  12. set value to 1
  13. OK
  14. Restart computer. https://pureinfotech.com/stop-chrome-gemini-nano-download-windows-11/

Or, you know don't install software from companies owned and operated by psychopaths, like Google and Microsoft.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

"Linux is hard" but godawful reg key hacks are fiiiiine, eh.