this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
85 points (91.3% liked)

Privacy

48704 readers
1079 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Youtube Link

Let me know if the invidious link does not work or if this is off-topic.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

this dude aside, pretty expected.

expect all proprietary software to be backdoored.

[–] qwestjest78@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Mental Outlaw is a weird dude. I stopped watching them long ago.

[–] BillMangionee@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 days ago

Pretty sure he was glazing trump like hell a while back, unsubbed from him then.

[–] magnue@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Dude buys all his haribo through mullvad with monero honest.

[–] voxel@feddit.uk 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

I must say that Mental Outlaw is known for using the wrong terminology, for example calling closed-source software "spyware", which bothers everyone who works in the cybersecurity industry because this is blatantly wrong. I assume it's the same story with this supposed "backdoor".

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Mental outlaw is a bit of nutter IMO. I couldn't live with that level of paranoia, so I stopped watching him.

[–] JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Also, extremely right-wing coded conspiracies.

[–] Pissed@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

Well left wingers and the far right do have one thing in common, they're usually both under lots of surveillance.

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah that too was a big reason why I stopped.

[–] agentTeiko@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah it so sad to start watching an Linux content creator. Yet again having to drop them when they are yet another alt-right wing nutjob.

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 days ago

You're into Linux because either you want to escape capitalism/closed source monitoring every aspect of your life, or because muh freedom.

[–] Hiro8811@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

It's a zero day that breaks bitlocker using some files on a USB.

Also spyware and bloatware are fairly often used for closed-source software because almost always closed-source code is either spyware or bloatware or both.

[–] aev_software@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So... can the FsTx file from my computer disable bitlocker on yours? Because that would be interesting.

[–] Hiro8811@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm not even sure what FsTx is but my guess is that you need a patched one, although it'd be an interesting to try if you got two PCs

[–] Doorknob@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Correct, there is extremely scant evidence for it being a backdoor in the video

[–] BillMangionee@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

I'm sure you're right, but it helps for a normie to privacy/security like my self, and viewer engagement.

You're right in that this isn't a backdoor. Its an exploit hes calling a backdoor.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

Oh no! Forbidden

Error: access denied: denied by administrative rule fa68ec4c0b694396d50ce50a8cf4cb6b/81a4d3ff51d16981b7d8

Why am I seeing this?
If you have any issues contact the site administrator and provide the following Request ID along with your browser details, specially like the User-Agent: fa68ec4c0b694396d50ce50a8cf4cb6b

Protected by go-away :: Request Id fa68ec4c0b694396d50ce50a8cf4cb6b

Just some basic browser protections, and I get this. Is this enshittified Cloudflare v2.0?