this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
7 points (81.8% liked)

General Programming Discussion

9932 readers
9 users here now

A general programming discussion community.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please start discussions that spark conversation

Other communities

Systems

Functional Programming

Also related

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] excel@lemming.megumin.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People told you AI would break shit. You used AI and it broke shit. You then failed review the broken things and also failed to test them, and then released it to everyone. Get off the high horse.

While it’s true that nobody is owed anything by an open source project, the appropriate response here is still to apologize for your poor judgement, and to discuss how you’ll be improving your processes to prevent this from happening again, not “lol I’ll do it again”.

Anyone relying on this tool should start migrating to one of the many alternatives.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's a really weird way to say fixed critical vulnerabilities. Also, wait till you find out how often people break shit without any AI being involved. The entitlement here is just off the charts. People maintaining open source projects don't owe you shit, and the maintainer certainly has nothing to apologize for. Don't like it, then go make your own and see how easy it is.