this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
76 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

85208 readers
3953 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 minutes ago

Once again: stop letting them use potable fucking drinking water it makes no sense

[–] voytrekk@sopuli.xyz 1 points 29 minutes ago

It's stupid how much they are pouring into hardware that might be vastly obsolete. By the time AI becomes truly intelligent, there may be specialized chips that are efficient at running models that blow GPUs out of the water.

Look at how it happened to bitcoin mining. Nobody serious is using a GPU to mine when ASIC is available.

However, I don't see all this hardware hitting the second hand market once a better solution is found. I'm sure they will keep trying to make compute hard to get for the average person so they can rent out their servers for a crazy price.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 9 points 1 hour ago

Fuck this.

I remember in the 00s imagining what AI might be like.

I did not imagine soulless chat bot that was going to steal all the water.

[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

What if we as a society decided to just not?

[–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 16 points 3 hours ago

It makes sense with the context in the article, but "triples that of 650 million" is a very strange way to say "almost 2 billion".

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 5 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Makes no sense. (I know that there are countries without proper regulation, but) around here they would simply not be allowed to use that much water.

They would need to build them in a way to not use that much water for cooling, and this would be controlled by officials during planning,build and operation.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 minutes ago* (last edited 4 minutes ago)

Many states with proper regulation would never allow this for literally any other industry without extensive permitting, and rightfully forcing the company to build its own treatment plants to support the increased load on existing systems

But somehow, nope. Fuck all that I guess.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Tech bros in general always seem to do it anyway and deal with complaints afterwards, preferably after lobbying or sueing to remove regulations.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

do it anyway

Not possible here, cowboy.

Good use of our resources

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Drinking needs or net water usage?