It's not talking about the technical aspects of AI, it's just talking about business stuff. That rule was implemented by popular demand, because the community was sick of 'technology' posts that were just business articles like this one is.
this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
11 points (82.4% liked)
Technology
2531 readers
38 users here now
Post articles or questions about technology
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
This is kind of the dark side of this IPO, which is that they have negotiated with the Nasdaq, which has one of the most popular index funds in the world. It's what houses many Americans' 401ks and their retirement portfolios.
There's a lot of money on the line here. And if Nasdaq can figure out a way to include SpaceX, then technically that means that they're going to get billions of dollars of inflows into that fund.
You're balancing, on the one hand, lots and lots of money, and on the other hand, credibility and the safety and security of passive investors' money. My view is that that was a bad decision by the Nasdaq. I think it'll come back to bite them.
This is as about a big of a story about technology impacting people as it gets. I am not fan of reading investor recommendations, but this is one of the biggest stories of our lifetime. If AI was a real developing profitable industry it would have real technologies and impacts to gesture at consistently, but since it is more a belief of an implementation soon rather than a working profitable implementation now the only way to quantify the degree to which a belief in something that doesn't really exist (AI) and yet is warping other very real things (the rest of technological development) is through economic terms.
I agree with you that it's a big deal, but given that it's essentially a business article and the comm explicitly has a rule against AI news that's not technical, I think it's a stretch to call the mods biased.
No
Just one?