Buy not every left leaning state has restrictive ammo laws

According to https://hopmunitions.com/ammo-shipping-restrictions-by-state/, this is the case for most states.

1. Alabama: No specific ammunition restrictions.
2. Alaska: No specific ammunition restrictions.
3. Arizona: No specific ammunition restrictions.
4. Arkansas: No specific ammunition restrictions.
5. California: Ammo shipments must be sent to an FFL unless the recipient has an FFL03 and a COE.
6. Colorado: No specific ammunition restrictions.
7. Connecticut: FOID is required for ammo purchases; there is no dropship ammo.
8. Delaware: No specific ammunition restrictions.
9. Florida: No specific ammunition restrictions.
10. Georgia: No specific ammunition restrictions.
11. Hawaii: No specific ammunition restrictions.
12. Idaho: No specific ammunition restrictions.
13. Illinois: FOID card required for ammunition purchases.
14. Indiana: No specific ammunition restrictions.
15. Iowa: No specific ammunition restrictions.
16. Kansas: No specific ammunition restrictions.
17. Kentucky: No specific ammunition restrictions.
18. Louisiana: No specific ammunition restrictions.
19. Maine: No specific ammunition restrictions.
20. Maryland: No sales of ammo to Annapolis.
21. Massachusetts: State-issued ID and FOID are required for ammunition shipments.
22. Michigan: No specific ammunition restrictions.
23. Minnesota: No specific ammunition restrictions.
24. Mississippi: No specific ammunition restrictions.
25. Missouri: No specific ammunition restrictions.
26. Montana: No specific ammunition restrictions.
27. Nebraska: No specific ammunition restrictions.
28. Nevada: No specific ammunition restrictions.
29. New Hampshire: No specific ammunition restrictions.
30. New Jersey: FOID and state ID are required for ammo purchases; there is no dropship ammo.
31. New Mexico: No specific ammunition restrictions.
32. New York: Ammo shipments must be sent to an FFL, or the customer must provide a valid state-issued ID and can only ship to the address on that ID.
33. North Carolina: No specific ammunition restrictions.
34. North Dakota: No specific ammunition restrictions.
35. Ohio: No specific ammunition restrictions.
36. Oklahoma: No specific ammunition restrictions.
37. Oregon: No specific ammunition restrictions.
38. Pennsylvania: No specific ammunition restrictions.
39. Rhode Island: A license is required for the purchase of ammunition; residents must be 21 years or older and possess a valid pistol or revolver safety certificate.
40. South Carolina: No specific ammunition restrictions.
41. South Dakota: No specific ammunition restrictions.
42. Tennessee: No specific ammunition restrictions.
43. Texas: No specific ammunition restrictions.
44. Utah: No specific ammunition restrictions.
45. Vermont: No specific ammunition restrictions.
46. Virginia: No specific ammunition restrictions.
47. Washington State: No specific ammunition restrictions.
48. Washington D.C.: No sales of ammo or projectiles.
49. West Virginia: No specific ammunition restrictions.
50. Wisconsin: No specific ammunition restrictions.
51. Wyoming: No specific ammunition restrictions.

The total MSRP for a Hightail is $10,950.

I've seen some mountain bikes go for more than that.

Really? I only use firefox and it worked fine for me.

Maybe it's geo-restricted? Or maybe it's an issue with an extension you use?

I know it's not a cert issue. And works fine if trusted by noscript.

https://ammoseek.com/

It's not easy bein' green

If you could also top it with glass, it would be less likely that the cat could eat a part of the finish. Also it might give you more options as you would not need to be as concerned about water.

However I'd say leave it unfinished for now just to see if the cat actually uses it.

Its the Shaka, Hawaii’s official state hand gesture.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaka_sign

I'd argue it's better to use actual alternatives. Half of the issue with free and open source software is that it's userbase is too small. If more people used it, it could actually improve in many ways.

Lets take gaming on Linux as an example. The userbase on steam is somewhere around 5%. So there is almost no incentive for developers to make games that run nativly on Linux. Its actually easier to run the games in a compatibility layer then to get a Linux port of a game. And although wine and proton work incredibly well, sometimes even running a game better than on windows; a Linux native version of every game would be ideal. Which will never happen with such a small userbase.

Next you have the terrible business practices of these companies. Even if you use the pirated versions. You are in their ecosystem and their community. You increase their profitability and their stock price simply by continuing the industry standard.

Pirated versions of software like this is excusable if you need it for work or sometihing. But imagine if instead of staying with the status quo, you use and help improve actual free and open source alternatives. Versons of software that don't steal your data or monetize how you use it by selling your input to others or stealing it for "AI" datasets.

Imagine using free and open source software that gives you feedom because your data stays on your devices, your creations belong to only yourself or who ypu choose to share it with, and you work with others to improve it; even if it's by just submitting bug reports. Imagine using something like that which you find so altruisticly beneficial that instead of pirating the software that has no respect for you, you donate money to the devs of free and open source software. Yes, I'm a pirate. But I do donate money to the right causes and something that protects my freedom is worth both my time and my money.

GameBanana mods have saved me so much wasted time while playing animal crossing nh with my daughter.

The game is cute but it's so slow with many long loading screens and has one if the worst UIs of any game I've ever played. Mods were able to help a bit atleast.

Fuck Nintendo.

Trumpeters often don't use their nose to play.

Honestly. It's about more than money.

If your boss says you must return to the office, after 3 years of WFH. At best, it shows that they do not value or respect you, and are just making an arbitrary decision in a bid to sell more stocks.

At worst, there might be some insidious reason to make employees physically available. Maybe they are getting a kickback somehow, or selling data that they can only get when you are there, or maybe they are just horny and want to seduce you sexually.

A remote worker is often happier, more productive, and cost less to employ even if they are paid the same as an on-site worker. Offices do not have to provide parking, seating, HVAC, power, wifi, and will even have less physical security vectors.

If some people prefer to go into an office, then it should be optional. Not a hybrid model where they force you to come a certain number of days a week.

At the end of the day unless you are on some kind of probation or evaluation period WFH should be the default when ever possible.