this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
19 points (100.0% liked)

Australian Politics

1820 readers
116 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shirro@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Immigration numbers aren't pulled out of a hat. There are a lot of factors like skill shortages, demographics etc taken into account. We could reduce numbers but we would need to do it carefully and plan for the consequences.

One Nation's concern about immigration is entirely a dog whistle for racial intolerance.

For shits and giggles the govt should announce a return of White Australia policy and doubling the intake and watch ON implode. Of course bringing out 10 bob poms to work in factories is fucking hopeless now we have shut them all down. What are they going to come here for? The skin cancer?

[–] minimumchips@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago

I understand immigration is a complex issue, but on the topic of skills shortages, if we really have had them for so long, why have wages stagnated so much in the last 15 years?

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What they're really saying is that corporations rely of wage suppression to maximise profits, and the housing and banking sectors rely on decreasing the number of dwellings per capita to accelerate the housing crisis.

If the government actually gave a shit the rate of immigration would be dependent on investment in housing, services, and infra otherwise all they're doing is driving up the cost of living and reducing quality of life for the existing population.

This bullshit is expected from neoliberal corporate whores.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

If the government actually gave a shit the rate of immigration would be dependent on investment in housing

This is one of Angus Taylors policies. It's still inaccurate though, because if they really gave a shit they'd just build houses enmass. The amount that goes on building housing - even under the housing Australia future fund, is fairly small compared to say, the military budget for a war we're not in.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Non experts definitely always know best

[–] Longmactoppedup@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Coalition and One Nation have proposed migration cuts as part of their housing policy.

Bahahahahaha!

The coalition, who serve their corporate donor overlords first and foremost, will never lower immigration if they get in to government. Look at their track record since John Howard! They must think the electorate is especially stupid to believe they would change their policy.

The real estate industry and big banks wear the coalition like a condom and they like house prices just the way they are thanks. Similarly the rest of big business wants an over supply of workers and consumers.

One nation I don't doubt wants to lower the intake of certain kinds of immigrants. But underneath they are corporate donor serving conservatives with added racism, so hitting F to doubt they would really lower immigration in the unlikely scenario they got in to government. Also Pauline might want to check Gina's track record on using cheap outsourced and visa ### labour to build her mines. Maybe she has had a change of tune but I doubt it.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

They must think the electorate is especially stupid to believe they would change their policy.

I mean... we have one nation voters... so yeah, there's a percentage who will go for this.