Arch is/was most mentioned, but most recommended? Not for new Linux users, even Arch users didn't do that.
Linuxsucks
For knowledge and awareness about what using Linux is really like and pointing at its cultish toxic community. We also cover FOSS /FLOSS failures, and issues with GPL since it relates to Linux. Moderation is heavy handed to appeal to our target users.
Rules:
- FOSS (especially GPL) advocates and Linux (specifically GNU/Linux) evangelists aren't welcome (GNU Hurd will count as Linux). -We ask that you block us and we will perma-ban for violations of this rule.
- Try to stay on topic (that is LINUXSUCKS!). No bashing other OSs or each other. We aim for a cohesive non-toxic community with the interest of cautioning people / would be victims from Linux. At our discretion, we will remove what we consider pollution.
- Moderators run the sub, not the users. It's not democratic, and we don't care how you think it should be run. -Feel free to make and run your own community.
- "Not your Billboard" -Over-represented companies will have positive posts removed and appropriate bans may be issued. -Those companies included so far will be Valve/Steam/Proton, Google, and Brave (browser).
Linux/FOSS can damage hardware or firmware
Linux running servers isn't a brag
Is Linux Running Games Near Windows Performance Impressive?
Wasted Ram on Different Toolkits and Distro-Agnostic Packages in Linux
Critical ISS Systems do NOT run Linux
Abandoned Software is Dangerous (and common on Linux)
Every Linux Tuber using it was a commendation from non-noobs (the loud vocal kind).
Meh. Shit happens.
There is only one Linux distro -- Debian. All others are just... well... nobody actually knows why they exist. Just for fun?