this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
57 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

85539 readers
3651 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
57
AMD ‘had to re-engineer’ the Ryzen 7 5800X3D for a re-release — 10th Anniversary Edition chip had ‘a whole body of engineering work’ put into it (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 10 hours ago by Sandbar_Trekker@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

AMD’s David McAfee, VP and general manager of Radeon and Ryzen, says that “a whole body of engineering work” went into the re-release, as the original bonding process TSMC used for the Ryzen 7 5800X3D was no longer available.

[...]

“It completely changed the characteristics of how those two pieces of silicon are bonded together and how they were stacked together, and so when that first-gen facility really kind of went offline, then it meant there was a whole, you know, body of engineering work that had to be done to understand if we could even migrate the 5800X3D to the new, second-generation stacking process,” McAfee said.

Well, a facility that can handle that process going offline explains why the processor stopped being produced even though it's been in high demand for a while.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 15 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

A whole body eh? I bet it was Dave the engineer; he always looked a little dead

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

Why are they re releasing a 10 year old chip?

Is not really answered, just that supply is low and people still buy it?

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 54 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

The specific chip is only 4 years or so old. The 10 years refers to the Ryzen series first release.

Why this specific chip? It is the fastest available for the older AM4 socket + DDR4 combination, so it is highly sought after by people upgrading their older rig without having to buy new expensive DDR5 RAM or a new mainboard.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 hours ago

Thanks!

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 16 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's 10th anniversary for ryzen, not that chip specifically. Also its it's quite good and outperforms most of their non x3d lineup

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago

Ohhhh

I feel stupid, thank you!

[–] QuadratureSurfer@piefed.social 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Quick recap of what's been happening recently:

  • The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is one of the best performing chips for gaming on AM4 motherboards that also supports DDR4. Demand has been high for this CPU even after it ran out of stock and even used units are sold far above MSRP.
  • Micron announced that they would stop providing RAM to consumers due to increasing demand for datacenters.
  • RAM prices skyrocket (especially DDR5)
  • Consumers turn to older DDR4 RAM since prices haven't gone up as much as DDR5
  • Demand for older Ryzen AM4 chips increases even more.
[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Consumers turn to older DDR4 RAM since prices haven’t gone up as much as DDR5

In absolute dollars, sure, but hoo boy those percentage jumps are ROUGH! I bought 16GB of no-name DDR4 for my aging desktop 15 months ago for USD 22. That same listing is now USD 100, and still pretty close to the cheapest retail I see, though that's only with an admittedly superficial search of Amazon and PC Part Picker.