this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
20 points (85.7% liked)

California

2116 readers
93 users here now

Welcome to /c/California, an online haven that brings to life the unrivaled diversity and vibrancy of California! This engaging community offers a virtual exploration of the Golden State, taking you from the stunning Pacific coastline to the rugged Sierra Nevada, and every town, city, and landmark in between. Discover California's world-class wineries, stunning national parks, innovative tech scene, robust agricultural heartland, and culturally diverse metropolises.

Discussions span a wide range of topics—from travel tips and restaurant recommendations to local politics and environmental issues. Whether you're a lifelong resident, a recent transplant, or planning your dream visit, /c/California is your one-stop place to share experiences, ask questions, and celebrate all the things that make California truly unique.

Related Communities:

Nearby Communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ghostpony@infosec.pub 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

What’s the rush? Voting is a fundamental right of every citizen. This is the kind of argument people who stand to lose when all votes are counted restore to. Democracy takes time. Let it take time. There’s no rush.

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Yeah. Voting should be a week long process at least, and anything other than a conclusive win should result in a run off.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I agree, but I also see a tradeoff: people instinctively feel a greater sense of agency when the effects of their actions are closer to the cause; if it comes weeks later it can seem more random even if it’s more reliable. Even if people know their votes counted, it can feel disempowering and depress future turnout.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

The effects of the actions have to wait until January anyway.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I want accurate elections that are as easy as possible for voters to participate in.

IDGAF if that upsets news anchors, Republicans & gamblers.

It also really doesn't matter given the US uses fixed terms, so politicians can't be seated earlier anyway.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

People walk their vote-by-mail ballots down to their local polling place at 7pm and wonder why their ballots haven't been counted by 8pm.

I'm in favor of doing everything possible to count ballots as quickly as possible as long as it doesn't effect accuracy.

More states and counties should be as accommodating to the people's rights to vote as California.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

California actively makes voting as easy as possible, protecting every citizen's right to do so despite disabilities, travel, Acts of God, and Acts of Trump. It took me a few days to fill out my ballot this time because I took time to find out about all the candidates for smaller offices and the money behind/opposing the various propositions and initiatives. But that's cool, I had my feet up at home doing it, and the information booklet they send is always a good start. Then I walked to the ballot box because for the first time I felt less sure about USPS. I got my text saying my ballot had been received and would be counted. It doesn't bother me if like Mr. Rogers, they "like to take the time to get it right." 🎶

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Drawing out the vote counting process opens up certain kinds of fraud, mostly benefiting the party with the best mobilization so that they can scramble to harvest votes if they need them. On the other hand, making this kind of fraud more difficult opens up other kinds of fraud or voter disenfranchisement which can benefit a different party.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 points 3 days ago

we can't make it a spectacle if it takes more than a day