Mouselemming

joined 2 years ago
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

And deserves to die broke.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 hours ago

And obscene profit while destroying poor families is kind of their brand.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, "the locals don't want to do this kind of work" at the wages I pay them.

It would drive up the cost of milk and milk products like baby formula, which is a hardship for poor families, but of course the government COULD step up more on WIC, because we know the GOP cares so much about babies and children!

Thinking now, I wonder how much of the American milk supply is bought by Nestlé. I bet there's a way they could eat the extra cost and still make a profit, just not an obscene profit.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes "Fight boobs with boobs!" would be a good English equivalent.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So where do we get our funding? I'm thinking about a billion, if we call it The Big Beautiful Golden Study, sponsored by plastic and dishwasher manufacturers.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lucky for the company, they don't appear to have hit any trees

Well, once one makes big headlines, and clicks, the media realizes it's been a neglected source of revenue.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Interesting thought, we'll have to include it in our study. I posit that the microparticles from hand washing will be larger anyway, because method, and will include plastic from the scrubber as well as the containers.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Hotter yes, but no plastic-on-plastic scrubbing. And not reusing the water wouldn't change the amount of plastic, it would just be diluted in a larger amount of water. My guess would be, larger particles. But I can see why that would have to be its own, more complicated study. Because so many more variables.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And yet somehow it lasts forever in a landfill.

We can't win.

 

And occasionally bites

 

It's not a crazier idea than most of Kennedy's. Someone should do a study. Or make one up, nobody checks anymore.

 

Using centripetal force puts it in trebuchet territory does it not?

 

Seems to me, calling the GOP the Right Wing contributes to their delusions of grandeur and self-righteousness. The fact it's only supposed to be "sitting on the right-hand side of the room" is lost in deliberate ignorance. Looking for a more accurate label. If you don't like these two choices you're welcome to ring in with your suggestions. Since other countries have their own versions of a Right Wing, ranging from something equivalent to the US Democratic Party to full-on fascism, y'all are welcome to weigh in on those as well.

view more: next ›