Directly comparing Scientology-speak to the beliefs and practices of the rationalists and their offshoots seems like it should be a ground-floor understanding of the whole mess, but perhaps that sort of blunt simplicity is what some folks on the margins need to avoid being sucked all the way in.
this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
9 points (90.9% liked)
SneerClub
1269 readers
16 users here now
Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.
AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)
This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.
[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]
See our twin at Reddit
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
High-theta in-ethics a+ sneer
She also has a post about meditation and mindfulness. I did not expect the thick Western Buddhist strand in this movement.
We've discussed before the influence of David Chapman and his Tibetan Buddhism among TPOT, but it's worth also noting the fairly big notoriety and footprint that San Francisco Zen Center has in the Bay Area and northern/central California more broadly. Anyone who ends up in the Bay and goes looking for "alternative" spirituality with a relatively rigorous grounding is likely to encounter some aspect of SFZC or its outreach pretty quickly. To say nothing of enduring idol Steve Jobs' association with the practice. It might seem surprising from the outside, but given the facts on the ground, I'm not surprised that dashes of Buddhism got roped into the techbro stew.
Note, of course, that Chapman's Tibetan lineage is something notably different from SFZC's lineage, and that the parent institutions can't be held totally liable for misinterpretations by lay practitioners and dilettantes. (Myself being one of the dilettantes!)
The rationalist in the comments calling the piece bad epistemics is chefs kiss.