this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
13 points (100.0% liked)

theNetherlands

2532 readers
18 users here now

Welkom op c/theNetherlands! Voor het delen van alles gerelateerd aan Nederland: nieuws, sport, humor, cultuur en vragen.

Titels van posts die linken naar een artikel dienen de onaangepaste titel van het artikel zelf te gebruiken.

Als je een nieuwsbericht post, is het daarnaast een goed idee er in een eerste comment je eigen mening over te geven. Dan geef je anderen alvast iets om op te reageren.

Hier gelden verder uiteraard de regels van onze instance:


Welcome to c/theNetherlands! For sharing anything related to the Netherlands: news, sports, humour, culture and questions.

Titles of posts linking to articles have to include the article’s title without alterations.

If you’re posting a news story, it’s also a good idea to give your own opinion in a first comment. Thereby you give others something to respond to. Note that the story has to be directly related to the Netherlands.

For the rest, the rules of our instance of course apply here:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/48722120

Archived version

A month or so ago, the Netherlands reportedly blocked a US company from buying the cloud provider that runs Dutch digital identity (there is a post about it in this community here).

The more recent news is that the Chief Privacy Officer of the Dutch government, who was behind this initiative, is about to lose his job.

...

For more than four months, Pieter van Oordt warned internally about the risks of the takeover. When these warnings were ignored, he brought the issue to the media, the Dutch Parliament, and the Cabinet. He showed that Parliament had received incomplete and misleading information and revealed that vulnerabilities in digital infrastructure had been shared with a U.S. company. His actions forced the Ministry of Economic Affairs to block the takeover.

Instead of protection, Van Oordt faced retaliation. He was excluded from meetings, his salary increase was blocked, and his request for protection under the European Whistleblower Directive was rejected, despite an expert report confirming that he should have been protected. He has been suspended, and his dismissal is mentioned in a written notice from the Attorney General on 22 May 2026.

The dismissal has not yet been implemented.

...

Someone started a petition (not me), I post this here as you may want to sign it (and maybe spread the word).

The petition calls on the European Parliament and the European Commission to act:

  • Protect Pieter van Oordt from an unlawful dismissal.
  • Ensure he can continue his work safely within the public sector.
  • Place digital sovereignty of vital infrastructure high on the European agenda.
  • Hold the Dutch government and the responsible ministries accountable.

[To read the English version of the linked text, you need to scroll down. It's below the Dutch version.]

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 6 points 23 hours ago

Since this concerns the Netherlands and the sidebar says it's OK to post stuff in English, I figured I could share it here. Hopefully that's alright.