the same happens in development with minimalism. for some reason it's the standard even among gnuhards, literally everything is black and as little expression as possible. there's these android drawers which literally show apps as a list of text with no icon. yeah, that's exactly what i want to see, so beautiful... or if you browse unixporn, you'll see most hyprland/niri whatever rices are gnome... i think we should definitely start to take a few lessons from the 2000's school of design. most defintely there were shitty thing, and code minimalism is good. but the user has so very little agency in the expression of how their software looks nowadays that's sad.
Technology
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
That's a problem that I had during UX class in my university because essentially good UX = whatever big company is doing.Who said that a search engine need to look like Google? Every different test to measure people is is to reinforce that what people are already used to, because some big company did in the past, is what everyone should be doing.
It's an interesting social phenomenon how most people tend to gravitate towards whatever style happens to be dominant at the time. And it's not that certain ones are inherently better than others as we see styles cycle over time.