this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
15 points (89.5% liked)

Australia

5061 readers
203 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In just three days, we lost two women and two girls to femicide across the country.

A man has been charged with killing Jana Armstrong - she is the fourth female victim of male violence in Australia since July 4. Jana was reported missing from Newtown, Queensland, on July 7. The alleged killer is known to her and charged with murder (domestic violence).

We also lost 13-year-old Layla Jeffery on July 4, a 17-year-old unnamed girl on July 6 and 39-year-old mum-of-two Lavanya Chappa on July 7.

In all their cases, the accused killers are known to the victims.

This is what a femicide epidemic looks like. It features men and boys killing women and girls because they can.

Jana, Lavanya, Layla, the unnamed girl - indeed all victims of femicide - deserve a national truth-telling. Their families deserve to be heard at a Royal Commission into the Killing of Women and Girls.

Please support Sherele Moody with her objective of making the govt hold a Royal Commission which would:

  • Examine all unlawful deaths of women and girls;

  • Examine the need for a federal femicide law similar to those already in place in other countries;

  • Investigate why First Nations women are more likely than any other woman to experience traumatic injury or death as a result of intimate partner violence;

  • Examine the complex and significant needs of women from diverse and marginalised backgrounds including First Nations women, women with English as a second language, women who are chronically ill or living with disability, sex workers, trans and gender non-binary people and women who are lesbian, bisexual, intersex or queer;

  • Lay bare the systemic failures that underpin the violent deaths of women and girls, including the ways in which police, the courts and support services routinely fail victims before they are killed;

  • Look into increased provision of appropriate resources and funding to ensure all women and girls have access to services including safe and affordable housing and legal supports;

  • Examine how the legal system is designed around the rights and needs of perpetrators not the victims and how this impacts sentencing, parole and bail outcomes;

  • Examine the factors of violence against women which Our Watch describes as: Condoning of violence against women; Men’s control of decision-making and limits to women’s independence in public and private life; Rigid gender stereotyping and dominant forms of masculinity; and Male peer relations and cultures of masculinity that emphasise aggression, dominance and control; and

  • Examine how social media and mainstream media frame attitudes towards women and girls.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice/recorded-crime-victims/latest-release

Victims of homicide and related offences were most commonly:

  • male (63% or 280 victims)
  • between 25 and 34 years of age (21% or 96 victims).

Why does an examination of homicides need to be for female victims only when the majority of victims are male?

As a survivor of domestic violence I am disgusted by the constant framing of women being the only victims of this serious issue.

There were ZERO services available when I found myself homeless as a teenager due to domestic violence because I am male.

[–] arbilp3@aussie.zone 1 points 57 minutes ago (1 children)

Women are not framed as the only victims of homicide but they and their children are killed in domestic violence in significantly greater numbers than men. Please check out this resource: https://www.aihw.gov.au/family-domestic-and-sexual-violence/resources/fdsv-summary.

A majority of victims of homicide in general are male and the majority of perpetrators of homicide are also male. This is the case worldwide, not just in Australia.

Again, I am really saddened that you had the experience you had when you were young. If it were happening today, there might be some improvement in getting the help you needed but that might depend in what part of the country you found yourself. By any account, domestic violence is a blight on our society no matter what our gender is.

It may be worthwhile speaking to a male indigenous counsellor about your past experiences because it sounds like you are carrying a lot of pain and you deserve to have peaceful life.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 1 points 28 minutes ago* (last edited 25 minutes ago)

In calling for a Royal Commission into femicide and ignoring that the majority of homicide victims are male, yes they are framing this as a female issue.

It may be worthwhile speaking to a male indigenous counsellor

Why would a male indigenous counsellor be relevant to me? And miss me with the faux sympathy.

Edit: Ohhh you assumed a male DV victim had to be Indigenous. Well that's disgusting.

[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The rate that women and girls die in this country is appalling. There are no real protections from violent men, men who have already proven they're violent, and women are just left to deal by themselves, with a piece of paper, that very obviously does nothing. Anthony albaneses comments recently on the need for a royal commission are disgusting. I hope this goes through, just to slap him in the face. It's not the first royal commission, and I'll bet with attitudes like they have towards implementing the recommendations, this one will be ignored too. Recommendations like raising welfare payments and doing away with partnered payments, to make financial abuse and control harder, and women able to leave. Specific Police task forces, and police training etc etc. I see women escaping violence who have to go to multiple police stations before they're listened to.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 7 points 5 hours ago

The rate? The rate is drastically improving, trending towards 0 by 2040. We don't need a royal commission into a problem that's rapidly improving and has done so for at least 35 years. To achieve such a feat with a growing population is impressive

https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/sr58_homicide_in_australia_2024-25.pdf

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone -2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

You really don't need a royal commission to understand why first nations people bash, rape and kill each other and partners so much. They are extremely over-represented in DV and the murder of women. This is especially true in regional communities where outsiders or whites are not permitted. Any social worker trying to help first nations people in those areas will tell you about the reality of the problem and how much of at uphill battle it is when nobody, including the police, can enter these areas. Children are regularly raped, and children are regularly raping, and nothing can realistically be done to break the cycle. The problem is similar in more urban areas. Interfering is a political disaster waiting to happen, remember the stolen generation? First nations children are taken away from unsafe environments now at a far higher rate than they were in the stolen generation. There's immense pressure to restore the children taken into care back into these unsafe homes/family, or not take them in the fist place which perpetuates harm. The cycle is doomed to repeat itself. The abused children then go on to offend themselves.

A femicide law? It's already illegal to kill people, harm people, stalk people.

The DV issue is pretty simple. Nobody wants to be accused of racism and deal with the fallout for interfering with the complex imported cultures and certain religions (again, very over-represented) in communities where this is prevalent and actually doing something about the problem. We dance around the topic and instead blame men in general which doesn't help the cause and turns sexes against each other. It's a political and societal disaster.

For the remaining cases, police and courts are too busy pursuing speech and whatever other bullshit our govt is pushing them to do next instead of focusing on real violent offenders

For too long women of Australia have suffered, but unless we're prepared to face some hard truths, they will continue to suffer at the hands of these violent people

[–] arbilp3@aussie.zone 2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

The DV issue is NOT simple, otherwise it would have been addressed better than it has.

You really don’t need a royal commission to understand why first nations people bash, rape and kill each other and partners so much.

You did not really answer your 'why'. You assert the difficulties of law-enforcement to intervene but that is not the reason why there is DV in these communities.

A general law against homicide is obviously not working is it? Women who report to police they fear for their lives because of threats they get from es-partners often are not investigated properly resulting in their deaths. It is one of the issues that have been documented over and over again.

As to the CALD-related DV incidents being over-represented, I am not saying you are wrong but would you be able to provide a link to statistics comparing DV incidents by background. I have not found the information myself.

[–] budget_biochemist@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

Women who report to police they fear for their lives because of threats they get from es-partners often are not investigated properly resulting in their deaths. It is one of the issues that have been documented over and over again.

My ex hit me in the face thousands of times during our relationship. I was slapped over and over again, whenever she was angry or upset. She threw things at me, poured drinks over my head, she smashed and destroyed my things.

I never did anything remotely close to that, and rarely even spoke in anger against her because I was in fear of her. However, one time I was tired and refused to get out of the bedroom after she ordered me to leave the room. She went to the police and was able to get a IVO on the basis of me refusing to leave the room.

The police said they "didn't care" about her violence and refused to do anything about all the other incidents where she physically attacked me. However on the basis of her just going to the police and asking, they got an IVO for her that required me to leave my home and never return.

If "not leaving the room when your wife tells you to" is sufficient threshold for police to get an IVO requiring a man to leave his home to protect a woman, maybe the problem isn't police not taking Women's reports seriously? Especially if literally being repeatedly hit in the face is not sufficiently bad to get police to do anything to protect me from violence.

As to the CALD-related DV incidents being over-represented, I am not saying you are wrong but would you be able to provide a link to statistics comparing DV incidents by background. I have not found the information myself.

The indigenous stats are well documented here. I'm not aware of any stats on other cultures.

[–] Nbard@aussie.zone 2 points 3 hours ago

This is brutal but I am always very ....curious about men who see a post about systemic violence against women and interject their own stories about how they're the victim. What is the purpose?

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

You literally tell your own tale of police mishandling DV then turn around and say things don't need to change.

Come the fuck on dude.

[–] arbilp3@aussie.zone 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I am sorry about what happened to you. Men are not the only ones that perpetrate violence. Domestic violence takes the lives of adults and children and traumatises those that survive.

However, statistics show that men's domestic violence against women (and other men) result in many more deaths and a lot of permanent harm from such as from broken bones, knocked-out teeth and brain damage. That cannot be ignored.

Also, please don't make statements about other groups (like they are over-represented) if you can't provide evidence. We need to stop the violence, not reinforce prejudices.

[–] Tau@aussie.zone 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

please don’t make statements about other groups (like they are over-represented) if you can’t provide evidence

Your own quote in the body of this post states that First Nations women are more likely than any other woman to experience traumatic injury or death as a result of intimate partner violence, and neither you or the article linked to evidence for this.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 1 points 14 hours ago

I feel like this is a culture problem as much as anything else. Which is why it's so hard to fix. You can't easily fix police officers, legal systems, etc, not taking women abuse victims seriously… they don't care because they don't have to. Later, something horrible happens, and what happens to the officials that completely failed in their duties? Literally nothing happens.

Imagine if this was any other malpractice that resulted in death. Someone walks in bleeding profusely and the doctor tells them it's not important and sends them home. Then they die, and the malpractice is very obvious and results in severe consequences. That's why doctors are so careful, they have a huge responsibility and duty of care.

I think the strongest lever to start with is to put higher responsibility to other professions. If someone dies after talking to the police and being dismissed, that should terrify the people involved. Right now they just shrug and forget about it, and do it again next month.

If someone reports abuse and fear of their life, make people care about it and take it seriously. That's step one.

[–] Aussieiuszko@aussie.zone -3 points 14 hours ago

You are bloody disgusting