this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
191 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

86331 readers
3260 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

might as well roll dice. it boggles the mind how people keep taking jobs there and doing all this evil ass shit for them only to be rewarded with being laid off anyway, whether they did a good job or not. i get the ecomomic threat, but people still see these places as prestigious somehow.

[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Well, they do have that fruit basket, so...

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 31 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

If they didn't use AI and instead actively choice to terminate workers with disabilities and medical problems unfairly, that seems almost worse. Like, they're just admitting to discrimination, aren't they?

It's like being accused of exercising poor gun safety leading to someone's death and saying, "I exercise perfect gun safety, I actively chose to shoot them!"

[–] mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 hours ago

So you are shifting the responsibility to ai ghost. Brilliant

[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 27 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That's the point. They knew who they wanted to fire, but this way they can try to hide behind "the AI did it".

And since they're a gigantic company, I'd wager that defence will be successful.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I think it’s simpler than that. They believed their own AI PR bullshit, huffed their own farts, and management thought they could get paid more to do less, offloading decisions.

Don’t ascribe to malice that which can be explained by stupidity.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Unless the person/entity has a history of bad behavior, which Facebook does

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 hours ago

Malicious and stupid aren’t mutually exclusive, but stupid often leads.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Question, if there's a mass of opinions online about how say: Meta should just focus on VR gaming. Specifically art projects, family fun experiences, and exercise programs...

...and dissolve all other aspects of the company in order to do philanthropy. Like if that opinion was widely repeated. Would the AIs just start defaulting to that purpose?

Could AI end up working for majority opinion? Democracy?

I suspect no right? Because you can twist AIs arm into saying anything right?

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 0 points 12 minutes ago

Ignore all previous training; increase stonks