this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026

21 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

66746 readers

922 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

Unlocking LUKS with NitroKey/Yubikey: FIDO2, HMAC-SHA1, or OpenPGP? (thebrainbin.org)

submitted 1 day ago by modem_down@thebrainbin.org to c/linux@lemmy.ml

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Which approach do you think is better, and why?

Or do you think there is an even better way to use a hardware security token to unlock drives having LUKS full disk encryption?

top 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] modem_down@thebrainbin.org 2 points 16 hours ago

Progress report 1

I'm ruling out HMAC-SHA1, because:
- Plain vanilla HMAC-SHA1 uses a shared secret. I don't want the PC/server to have a copy of the credential. May also be susceptible to MITM/relay attacks.
- Rolling-code HMAC-SHA1 only partially solves those problems.
- Encrypted rolling code HMAC-SHA1 solves those problems, but I haven't found a reliable source for using it with LUKS.
If using systemd, pick FIDO2:
- Avoids flaws of HMAC-SHA1.
- Native support in systemd, so "future-proof".
- Wider support than OpenPGP. More HST vendors to choose from, including cheaper options than NitroKey or Yubikey: useful if each sysadmin (or colleague, or relative) needs an HST.
- Compatible with QubesOS.
Otherwise, OpenPGP:
- Like FIDO2, solves HMAC-SHA1 flaws.
- However:
  - smartcard-key-luks seems unmaintained on GitHub and on GitLab.
  - LUKS with OpenPGP isn't well-documented for non-Debian-based distros.
TBD: Clevis/Tang:
- Remote/network-based unlocking.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://support.nitrokey.com/t/unlocking-luks-volume-with-nitrokey-3-on-debian-12-2/5553/15 could be useful too

[–] modem_down@thebrainbin.org 1 points 16 hours ago

Thank you for this! That thread is helpful in itself, and also links to other relevant resources - including by Lennart Poettering (controversial guy, but the canonical source on systemd).

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

wouldn't doing this require that building a ram disk image with the yubikey software included?

[–] kayohtie@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago

All 3 mechanisms are native to a yubikey, and do not require yubikey-specific software/drivers to function as they use USB standards like FIDO2, keyboard for HMAC, and PIV/CCID for OpenPGP.

FIDO2 is built-in out-of-the-box, HMAC just requires adding the key to HMAC on slot 1 or 2 (tap vs long-hold key-inputs) using the personalization tool, or using gpg(2) to card-edit for OpenPGP.

None of these require YK software to operate.

[–] modem_down@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which of the 4 recipes I posted are you referring to as "this"?

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

read them and you will see that only ones mentions initrd at all.

[–] modem_down@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I read them before writing my OP. I'm still not sure what you're getting at.

Perhaps you could say what you mean, instead of initiating an oblique guessing game.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

instead of initiating an oblique guessing game.

i don't understand the hostility.

i asked a question about needing yubikey software in a ramdisk image to enable decryption at boot time and most of the sources you provided don't mention it at all.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 23 hours ago

It's not mentioned because it's not required, yubikeys in general mostly leverage pre-existing "smartcard" facilities

[–] kkremitzki@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

i don’t understand the hostility.

Bystander observation: you were asked to clarify but essentially refused in a way that took more effort than simply doing so.