109
submitted 10 months ago by Pips to c/technology@beehaw.org
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cduke23@beehaw.org 30 points 10 months ago

It’s always the ones you most suspect…

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 6 points 10 months ago

Like... some fried bank man?

(I know, bad joke is bad)

[-] Hisnitch@beehaw.org 25 points 10 months ago

So, interesting point here is that the jury only took 4 hours to complete. Just four. That means that they basically made up their minds and they just needed to confirm.

[-] cwagner@beehaw.org 12 points 10 months ago

If someone thought he was innocent, SBF would probably "well, actually…" them.

[-] Hisnitch@beehaw.org 8 points 10 months ago

Judging from my understanding of the trial, that pretty much sums up his defense.

[-] termus@beehaw.org 20 points 10 months ago
[-] ulkesh@beehaw.org 17 points 10 months ago

At least some asshole in this country gets the consequences they deserve.

[-] sculd@beehaw.org 15 points 10 months ago

Good riddance

[-] Smoke@beehaw.org 12 points 10 months ago

I swear the courtroom sketch artist has a grudge, he looks downright ghoulish in the article's picture.

[-] bloopernova@programming.dev 12 points 10 months ago

The One Ring has not been kind to Smeagol...

[-] vhstape 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's giving Frankenstein's monster...

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 months ago

115 years. Where is your mind at knowing that.

[-] ripcord@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

Under sentencing guidelines they're very unlikely to be served consecutively. Probably more like 20 years.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 10 months ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summarySam Bankman-Fried, who once ran one of the world's biggest cryptocurrency exchanges, has been found guilty of fraud and money laundering at the end of a month-long trial in New York.

They presented evidence that Bankman-Fried's crypto trading firm Alameda Research received deposits on behalf of FTX customers from the early days of the exchange, when traditional banks were unwilling to let it open an account.

Instead of safeguarding those funds, as Bankman-Fried repeatedly pledged to do in public, he spent the money to repay Alameda lenders, buy property and make investments and political donations.

Bankman-Fried made the risky move of taking the stand in his own defence, hoping to convince jurors that prosecutors had failed to prove he acted with criminal intent.

Bankman-Fried defended the money transfers between his firms as "permissible" and testified that he was largely unaware of the financial hole described by his deputies until a few weeks before the FTX collapse last year.

Panorama explores the breakneck rise and sensational fall of Sam Bankman-Fried, the maths genius who set out to transform the world of crypto but ended up being its biggest loser.


Saved 67% of original text.

[-] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

Can’t wait to see how the 1:1 GME tokens are resolved

this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
109 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37573 readers
296 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS