176
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] effingjoe@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

But in an ongoing federal suit over the ordinance, the city said the ticketing was part of “Houston’s governmental obligations to ensure food safety.”

This reminds me of the now-infamous Lee Atwater quote. (warning: racial slurs) It's abstracting bigotry.

[-] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 19 points 1 year ago

Texas really is a shit-heap isn't it?

[-] burndown@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

Houston is one of the most progressive cities when it comes to homelessness. Can't comment on this specifically but the goal is to get people into actual homes instead of maintaining the dependency on panhandling. It's actually worked and other cities should follow its lead: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/14/headway/houston-homeless-people.html

[-] effingjoe@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Starving them out doesn't magically get them shelter.

[-] burndown@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Did you read the article? Not sure how you get "starving them out" from that...

[-] effingjoe@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

They're preventing people from feeding them. Which article are you referencing? The one you provided or the one in the OP?

[-] burndown@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

That doesn't mean they aren't getting fed at all. I'm referring to the one I linked.

[-] effingjoe@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I don't know who you think you're kidding. Are you really suggesting that there's more than enough food for the homeless population in Houston? Does that seem like even a plausible scenario?

I applaud their efforts to get homeless people into homes-- that is the only way to combat homelessness, but there doesn't seem to be any defense in preventing organizations from donating food to the homeless that aren't in homes yet.

[-] burndown@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not necessarily saying you shouldn't, just look at the bigger picture before you disregard all of the city's effective efforts...

[-] effingjoe@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like you forgot to keep track of usernames, my friend. Glad to see I'm not the only one that does that, haha.

[-] burndown@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I'm talking in general, not to anybody specifically other than the first response

[-] effingjoe@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Oh, well, in that case, I'd flip it around. Don't defend the indefensible just because the city does good elsewhere.

[-] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Funeral homes, presumably.

[-] CoderKat@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Would it really be Texas if they weren't constantly being shitty? Texas and being shit goes together like PB&J. And most Texans seem proud of that. They care more about "owning the libs" than being a quality place to live.

[-] effingjoe@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

The oddity here is that Houston is pretty liberal, I think. If it were a state law I'd be saying the same thing as you.

[-] Thepinyaroma@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Seems like a blatant violation of the first amendment.

Peacefully assembling to share a meal isn't speech? Who the fuck says all these people aren't my friends and family?

[-] SpicaNucifera@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Wow fuck right off??

[-] bingo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

My city is 'upgrading' their downtown district, which involves heavily policing an area where a lot of homeless would sleep at night. Cops said they'd start punishing people who give them food, and that they set up cameras to watch them.

I'd like to see them actually try to punish anyone for this. "Oops, I just forgot my bag full of groceries next to this homeless person."

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
176 points (98.9% liked)

politics

18802 readers
4387 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS