539
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Republican lawmakers in the US are leaning into outdated definitions of obscenity to outlaw drag and ban books too

For five months this year, homosexuality was prohibited in a Tennessee college town.

In June, the city council of Murfreesboro enacted an ordinance outlawing “indecent exposure, public indecency, lewd behavior, nudity or sexual conduct”. The rule did not explicitly mention homosexuality, but LGBTQ+ people in the town quickly realized that the ordinance references 21-72 of the city code, which categorizes homosexuality as an act of indecent sexual conduct.

The ordinance was essentially a covert ban on LGBTQ+ existence.

Erin Reed, one of the first and only national journalists to cover the ordinance earlier this year, noted that Murfreesboro isn’t “the only community that has these old archaic bits of code that target homosexuality”.

Earlier this month, following a legal challenge from the ACLU of Tennessee, the government of Murfreesboro removed “homosexuality” from the list of acts defined as “public indecency” by the city code. The small victory came after officials repeatedly refused to issue permits for the BoroPride Festival, citing the new ordinance.

(page 2) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] interceder270@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Was anyone persecuted for this?

[-] oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I'm sure this won't be a popular opinion, but how is this surprising? Gay marriage was voted down at the state level many times all across the country. Those voters are still out there and 5 supreme court justices didn't change their opinions on homosexuality.

[-] HandBreadedTools@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

This is the most worthless comment I've read on lemmy yet, not only is it wrong or also acts smug about it lmfao get outta here

[-] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Your entire comment history is antagonism or insults. I rarely even think this much less say it, but: please go back to Reddit. You’re the reason we all left there.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago

Based on documented state voting the majority of the population would agree with my statement. You are in the small minority. Bitch all you like, that will not change.

[-] bus_go_fast@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Based on documented state voting the majority of the population would agree with my statement.

What state? What would they agree with?

[-] oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

I said in a earlier reply that gay marriage was voted against many times, in multiple states all across the USA. That's what I was referring to, feel free to Google it.

[-] HandBreadedTools@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Please, just do a simple Google search and educate yourself:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_opinion_of_same-sex_marriage_in_the_United_States

Gay Marriage has had one of the most radical changes in public opinion of any concept in general. The overwhelming majority of people are in favor of it, to the point that it would be law even in places you would not expect.

I said what I said about your comment because it was smug and objectively untrue. Nothing irritates me more than that combination. Please, understand the way you learned things years ago does not determine the immutability of them.

[-] oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._state_constitutional_amendments_banning_same-sex_unions

That's a quick Google search. It barely made it through the supreme court, passing 5/4. I'm not sure where you are gathering your information, but it's skewed.

Another search https://www.dailysignal.com/2014/10/06/states-voted-gay-marriage-now-forced-upon/

[-] HandBreadedTools@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Dude did you even read my original comment? I said that the public opinion towards same-sex marriage has changed drastically. I appreciate you linking an article from 2014 from a highly biased conservative site, but, aside from the bias, it has no relevancy as the source I linked to you was as of 2022.

Show me a source that actually supports your claim.

[-] oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Also, I added the first additional link I found as anyone can update Wikipedia without validity.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago
[-] oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

I assumed push back as you don't agree with the actual facts I posted, but didn't expect you to put blinders on. How do you factually measure how people feel? The answer is clearly you don't. I said gay marriage was voted down many many MANY times in different states all across the United States. It was, that actually happened. The people that voted against still actually exist, and it's likely their opinion has not changed just because you don't like it. How fucking obtuse can one person be?

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago

Why is it likely that their opinion has not changed? I, for one, change my opinion if I find it doesn't suit me anymore

[-] oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

If someone voted against a topic like this so many feel so strongly about I think it would be hard to change their minds. What could I say to convince you otherwise on this topic?

[-] Saltblue@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

It's hard to change opinions when religion and lead have rotted your brain

[-] oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Or a liberal. Liberals are the same.

[-] Saltblue@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I know, but the funny thing is that this place is very traditional and religious... In paper.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 0 points 11 months ago

So you're implying that an opinion may be subject to change unless one had already voted on some matter based off of that opinion thus committing to following that opinion for the rest of one's life?

[-] oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Not at all, I said that people are on one side of this topic, and it showed in the actual votes they placed. Then with a 5/4 vote in the supreme Court the government told them their opinion didn't matter. That alone will make someone loath the decision and keep their opinions. I've made myself very clear, and I think everyone here understands my point perfectly, some don't agree with it, to them I say, whatever.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 0 points 11 months ago

Well, you can count me out, I did not understand your point perfectly, not sure about the rest.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
539 points (97.2% liked)

News

23293 readers
5038 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS