27
Engineering your microwave's Popcorn button (img.wonderhowto.com)
submitted 8 months ago by kersploosh@sh.itjust.works to c/engineering@sh.itjust.works
40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A friend recently pointed out that, despite most microwave ovens having a Popcorn function, most bags of popcorn specifically say NOT to use that function. It got me wondering how the Popcorn button works (or doesn't work). Apparently there are several different approaches in common use.

Basic method: Microwave on full power for a set amount of time. With clumsy designs like this I'm not surprised the popcorn sellers would discourage using the Popcorn button.

Improved method 1: Have the user enter the weight of the popcorn bag. The microwave adjusts the cooking time accordingly. Better, but still not great.

Improved method 2: Add a humidity sensor to detect the humidity change when the bag bursts open. Much better; now we have a real-time feedback mechanism.

Improved method 3: Add a microphone to listen for the time between pops, just like humans do. I had no idea this was a real thing, but apparently it has existed for years. For example, Whirlpool calls its implementation "AccuPop."

Does anyone have another clever idea to add to the list?

top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] transientpunk@sh.itjust.works 68 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I also watched the recent Technology Connections video.

[-] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 months ago

I'm not familiar with Technology Connections, but judging by all the comments I clearly need to check it out.

[-] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

You really do, it's a great channel. See you in a few days lol

[-] transientpunk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Very much worth the watch. It is a quality channel.

[-] b0gl@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Do it. He's legendary

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 59 points 8 months ago

https://youtu.be/Limpr1L8Pss?si=0BWlyIg4iUaM_su9

[-] andyMFK@reddthat.com 32 points 8 months ago

Gonna upvote this without clicking on it assuming it's the technology connections video

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

None other.

[-] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

Link without site tracking: https://youtu.be/Limpr1L8Pss

I am not a bot, and this action was performed manually.

[-] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

fuck youtube ?si= identifier codes

all my homies hate ?si= identifier codes

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 8 months ago

a friend called alec watson, who has a popular youtube channel who released a video recently with this exact information, point for point, by any chance?

[-] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 24 points 8 months ago

I'll play devils advocate here and say their friend is the one who watched Technology Connections and passed the info onto them.

[-] bfg9k@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

It looks like we made....

... a technology connection.

[-] newjunkcity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 8 months ago

I honestly don't get what runs through the head of people when they summarise someone else's research and try and pass it off as their own (...or their "friend's").

I mean, it's a niche, but nonetheless popular YouTube channel. Did they think they wouldn't get called out?

Even if they did (think that they wouldn't get called out), what possible gain is there from passing it off as their own? Internet points from anonymous strangers?

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

Even if they did (think that they wouldn't get called out), what possible gain is there from passing it off as their own? Internet points from anonymous strangers?

Almost makes you wonder if maybe they weren't trying to take credit for someone else's thing, and simply had a conversation with a friend who recently watched that video (or saw that thumbnail, or maybe even just had the same idea around the same time)

[-] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

I dislike presets with a passion, just like "shooting modes" on a camera.
Or at least document specifically what it does.

My camera has a "pet mode" with a sub-menu where you can choose between "cat" and "dog". I mean, what the fuck does this do?

[-] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 8 months ago

How do you take a picture of this then? 1000028749

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 10 points 8 months ago

Set it to dog.

Cat-dog is a type of dog, else they’d have been called dog-cat.

[-] FierroGamer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

You mean like how a red panda is a p... Erm... Raccoon?

[-] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

You don't!

[-] wisemanzero@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

It's for red-eye,I think. Pets eyes reflect light differently from humans and each other's so automatic (human) red eye removal doesn't work.

[-] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Probably a placebo to make people think the camera is smarter than it really is

[-] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 months ago

Sheesh. I did some Googling, posted this quick write-up thinking it was an interesting tidbit, went to bed, and woke up to accusations of ripping off a YouTube channel that I wasn't aware of. This was my "Simpsons already did it" moment. I accept that most of my thoughts are unoriginal, but please don't accuse me of intentional plagiarism. I'll try to be better about linking sources next time.

For what it's worth, here are some of the places I found info:

[-] Shayreelz@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

I just assume your friend watched the video since it was released recently (it was the first video from that channel that I'd seen). That's so often how "Simpson Moments" can appear in the wild in this way

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

I hope the dickhead commenters haven't soured your experience with the channel, it's well worth watching! My favorite videos of his are the rice cooker one and the dishwasher one because they've legitimately changed how I use my appliances

[-] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

I actually just checked it out on my lunch break and spent 30 minutes learning about brake lights. I see why this guy has so many followers! I'm going to start showing his stuff to my kids.

And to address the other comment you left, I checked back with my friend who brought up popcorn buttons and he did get it from the recent Technology Connections video. Apparently that bastard has been into this channel for years but never told me about it.

[-] Daefsdeda@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

I get how that is annoying, lemmy (haha) just say that I am just glad that you posted. Such hate for such a small thing that wasn't even malice and still spread around a good message is stupid. We should be motivating people to keep posting and we can't afford it as a small community to lose passion over this.

[-] Streetdog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

I'll be in the market for a microwave soon. Guess I'll be checking out Whirlpool. Thanks for the info!

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I think it would be simpler to print the proper cooking time on each bag and allow the user to set the oven accordingly.

[-] Kvoth@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

You do realize that's not only exactly what they attempted to do in that image, but the "cooking time may need to be adjusted" part is because microwaves have drastically different amounts of power. Most times are based on thousand watt models, but they can vary from 600-2000 watts from what I've seen. No one time will work for that

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Right, so maybe a suggested range, then, like 2-2½ minutes.

[-] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

like 2-2½ minutes

That's not a wide enough range. 600 to 2000 is over at 3x difference in power, with the corresponding 3x difference in cooking time.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Which is why I said "suggested." Maybe add a little note that cooking time may need to be adjusted.

[-] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

It literally already does?

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Ah! Looks like this one's already been figured out then! Our work here is done.

[-] PapaStevesy@midwest.social -1 points 8 months ago

Would that be considered bloatware? I certainly don't need or want it.

[-] octoperson@sh.itjust.works -4 points 8 months ago

The ideal microwave would have

  • a dial to set the timer
  • NO OTHER CONTROLS!

Start/stop? Use the door. Clear? Turn back the dial. Power settings? Full power, wait, repeat. Everything else? Nobody uses it, nobody knows what it does, nobody kept the instructions. Get rid of it.

[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

My microwaves sensor button works for almost everything perfectly

[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

We have some of these at work. The display is that the dial numbers light up as you turn the dial then blink out as the timer runs down.

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
27 points (66.7% liked)

Engineering

729 readers
1 users here now

A place to geek out about engineering, fabrication, and design. All disciplines are welcome. Ask questions, share knowledge, show off projects you're proud of, and share interesting things you find.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. Generally stay on topic.
  3. No homework questions.
  4. No asking for advice on potentially dangerous jobs. Hire a professional. We don't want to be responsible when your deck collapses.

The community icon is ISO 7000-1641.

The current community banner image is from Lee Attwood on Unsplash.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
kersploosh@sh.itjust.works