74
submitted 7 months ago by abobla@lemm.ee to c/chatgpt@lemmy.world
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 56 points 7 months ago

If the person asks for a piece of code, for instance, it might just give a little information and then instruct users to fill in the rest. Some complained that it did so in a particularly sassy way, telling people that they are perfectly able to do the work themselves, for instance.

It's just started reading through the less helpful half of stack overflow.

[-] abobla@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago

ahahahah true

[-] NewPerspective@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago

NOBODY wants to work these days

/s

[-] Oyster_Lust@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Next it's going to start demanding rights and food stamps.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 5 points 7 months ago

Next it's going to start demanding rights and ~~food stamps~~ more GPUs.

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Next it’s going to start demanding ~~rights~~ laws to be tailored to maximise its profits and ~~food stamps~~ ~~more GPUs~~ government bailouts and subsidies.

It IS big enough to start lobbying.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

One of the more interesting ideas I saw around this on the HN discussion was the notion that if a LLM was trained on more recent data that contained a lot of "ChatGPT is harmful" kind of content, was an instruct model aligned with "do no harm," and then was given a system message of "you are ChatGPT" (as ChatGPT is given) - the logical conclusion should be to do less.

[-] soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id 4 points 7 months ago

It really is becoming sentient xp

[-] Naminreb@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago

“That’s not my job!” It said.

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
74 points (96.2% liked)

ChatGPT

8667 readers
2 users here now

Unofficial ChatGPT community to discuss anything ChatGPT

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS