What they're doing isn't a crime. They're just reading headlines and producing (very) short summaries. Load Google news and what you see there is the problem.
A lot of the time, people don't want or need to read the full article. Everything they wanted to know is in the headline and occasionally, the byline. When Google or Meta reproduce that headline and/or a super short summary on their sites with the link, the end users are getting the gist of the article without loading the ads that would have been displayed if they went to the original site.
This is fine. It's not a crime. It's not even unethical! They're literally implementing "the web" as it is meant to be used since forever.
If you want to outlaw this, you're advocating for a very ugly reality where people can't even use curl and/or Python to grab news headlines for their own purposes.
Remember when Windows 7 shipped with news headlines in the widget sidebar? That had the same problem (for publishers).
It's not the only animal like this! The Iberian Ribbed Newt (Pleurodeles waltl) will push its own ribcage out of its chest (turning them into spikes) and secretes toxic venom through those bones...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iberian_ribbed_newt