Maybe some European guy and the Native American guy can be killing a third, obviously very rich-looking European guy while holding hands a la the old USSR propaganda posters with the cute Russian and Chinese guys with their cute bi-racial family
Based. Putting your kid's life at risk should not be allowed just because you think your religion says so.
Yeah people would just say and write in internet comments "I'm pickle riiiiick" just to be sO rAnD0m LoL And there were pickle rick shirts and shit. And so many "memes" that were just that picture of pickle rick. It was a combo of the fan base being really annoying about it and also it being a dumb joke (if you could even call it a joke). The fan base was extra cringe around that time
Bro, it's the original Lemmy instance. It does not matter what instance you're on. I have two accounts with the same name one on dbzero and one on ml - feel free to peruse.
You didn't give me anything to respond to except for: "MAGA and Marxist-Leninism are equally incoherent" - and you gave nothing to substantiate that point, ergo it is a "braindead take" because it required no thought. If you want it to not be a braindead take, then make an argument rather than an unfounded (and probably uninformed) statement.
Okay I'll bite. Meet the burden of proof. Explain what you mean. How are the MAGA ideology (to the extent that there is one) and the Marxist-Leninist ideology equally incoherent? And, similarly, in what ways are potential views on this particular issue as expressed in that letter shared by MAGAs and MLs?
I am not an ML, but this is a brain-dead take
Fake: is living a lie
Gay: jerks off to guys
It's fine and not at all contradictory to care for existing people with Downs and also work to eliminate the condition.
I appreciated the ball tanning context. Well anyway, gotta go tan my balls now
It really depends, but ultimately a lot of social interactions can only happen between two people at once. Say you and your wife get into a fight. Instead of fighting it out & making up, she now has the option to stop fighting you and go hang out with your co-husband - and you aren't invited. She also has the option to emotionally strong arm you to get her way by not only stonewalling you/withholding affection, but also by threatening to push you out of your marriage for another guy who literally lives with you both. Conversely, she does the same thing to the other guy.
Basically, now all those 2-person social interactions that happen in a marriage become much more complicated due to the presence of a 3rd person.
You'd need to have a lot of trust in your wife (and this other guy too) - she'd need to have a tremendous amount of emotional stability and be non-manipulative. She'd suddenly have a lot more power in the relationship in a very inequitable way.
My wife and I are very into monogamy. But she has a serious temper and can be very manipulative when she's angry (she's gotten better about this, but it's a known issue). It'd be very easy for her to do something hurtful. I'm not talking about sex, just the emotional threat of turning to someone else for relief from me - and the implied threat of pushing me out.