Anamnesis

joined 2 years ago
[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The part that's bothering people is the "traumatized people can't be responsible for other people's comfort." It sounds too much like "I'm sorry if my reaction made you uncomfortable, but I have trauma and so I'm not responsible."

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think there are two ways of reading the claim that a traumatized person can't be responsible for other peoples' comfort. The first is reasonable: nobody is really responsible for anyone else's comfort. We have to take care of ourselves at the end of the day, so mentally healthy people especially shouldn't rely on traumatized people to make them comfortable.

The second is unreasonable: traumatized people, more than anyone, have no obligation to do the basic things that make other people comfortable, in virtue of their trauma.

I think the post just makes it sound a little too much like the second interpretation, because otherwise why focus on traumatized people in the first place? I think that's what's getting under most peoples' skin.

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I mean, the point of therapy is to work through your trauma in a way that allows you to avoid maladaptive behaviors, which might include being overly sensitive in situations where it isn't appropriate and doesn't help you. We can make some changes to accommodate the bad things that have happened to people, but having trauma doesn't give you license to go around the world inflicting your emotions on everyone around you. Your mental illness is not your fault, but it is your responsibility, and all that.

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Muffins are cake. I don't eat cake except on special occasions. I think this is a pretty good rule.

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Are there any good ones nowadays that don't sound like a robot?

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Are we sure he's not just defending the hopelessly corrupt Clarence Thomas?

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Didn't expect the deep state to be the national park rangers.🎶

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Even cats will fuck you up if they really intend to.

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

This is my dog. It took so damned long, and so much careful training, to get her to accept that sometimes I have to go to work but that I always come back.

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Sorry to tell you but I'm a millennial in law school right now and all my classmates are zoomers. 😬

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago (11 children)

I guess this is supposed to be funny but it reads as sad and abusive to me.

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I'm in law school right now. AI is pretty helpful for researching briefs. You can ask it super specific legal questions and get answers with citations. But what you can't do is just copy and paste shit and not check the citations to make sure they're real.

The idea that they'd use AI to write the test questions and not independent verify them is ridiculous.

view more: ‹ prev next ›