To an extent, but 10 skilled diverse people will result in higher quality than 10 skilled same people.
So yes, care about skill, but also make sure you get some free innovation by having varied opinions from differing cultures, backgrounds, genders, etc.
You're right, you will definitely get downvoted with that opinion. The corpos sucking up data to track and advertise and whatever else is annoying, and i don't want to make it even easier for them. And i definitely don't want to help my shitass government round up undesirables any easier than they already can (including from those corpos...). There are no positives that i care about from an actual digital id. Privacy is harder and harder to come by everywhere in life, i don't want to give an ID to use discord, steam, lemmy, or anything else.
Nah, fuck the AG for tying these 2 issues together. They don't give a fuck about gambling, they just see a huge marketplace ripe for online ID and are snaking their way into it if they can.
Case and point right here with that correction.
So glad Digital Foundry escaped them and went independent.
They didn't listen at all. We don't want id verification. Period. Full stop.
Switching from terrible to potentially less terrible isn't listening.
You can thank the ai companies for the intolerance, many are okay with the technology itself.
I wouldn't equate it with any human teacher still though. Even someone who has difficulty saying "i don't know." Has less difficulty saying it than LLMs do, hallucinations are an unsolved problem for now.
Not op, but i assume they just mean talking to an llm about spiritual topics. Especially local ai, if you pick a less censored model so it doesnt constantly spit refusals, they can hold conversations on difficult topics pretty well now. Whether that is politics, religion, law, finance, medicine, or roleplaying porn, doesnt really matter to the llm.
This could use more granularity
Yeah images is actually a bad example for us humans. Using a small model with a modern lora, you can generate near photorealistic images, easily 1 every second or so on moderate hardware.
Granted we can make 1 "perfect" image better than most big image models typically can even with lots of time, but thats a different discussion.
We're talking about "elites" of society. So yes, you should do the bare minimum google search on the person you're emailing about getting in touch with a billionaire lol.
This isn't some small example where you were trying to get in touch with someone at your medical insurance agency and unknowingly wound up on the phone with a convicted rapist who made the local news...
Nobody ever says to pick the worse fit candidate just because they are a woman or whatever. That is a bullshit talking point by small minded people.