Apepollo11

joined 2 years ago
[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 5 points 35 minutes ago (1 children)

I want to be sympathetic but alarm bells are ringing with the immediate juxtaposition of "that's all fine but I genuinely begin to develop feelings for her" and "I just don't really care all that much for a friendship".

If the issue was that painful to be around her until you can work the feelings out, then that wouldn't be half as bad as saying that she's not worth keeping as a friend if you can't date her.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

They lent me a tent, but the one they sent had been bent. I wept, but at least it hadn't been lost in the mail. I'm sure they never meant any harm.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

So kind of like Taming of the Shrew but more so?

Instead of it being a man cleverly trying to win over a woman through manipulation and abuse, it's a woman-hating man cleverly trying to win over a woman through manipulation and abuse?

Even if it did exist, I'm not sure it'd be that watchable. Taming of the Shrew is pretty dubious as it is, but it was written over 400 years ago, so it can be excused somewhat.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Username checks out...

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Functionally, in conversation they're the same. But, that said, if I was talking about somebody the listener was close to, I'd use "had died", rather than "is dead".

Why? Because it's slightly less direct, and I'm British so that's the path we take.

Pointing out that someone "is dead" directly alludes to them being a corpse right now. Saying that they "had died" merely references something that they did.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

At least he didn't skirt around the issue...

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 36 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm hoping that the Defence absolutely rakes United and other Healthcare providers across the coals, showing all the nasty things they get up to. The high profile of the case will allow this stuff to be laid bare to the masses.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is where anti-vaxxers sound like.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That’s what antivaxxers sound like.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This. It always baffled me why the BBC legitimises it by including it in the newspaper summaries. Might as well have included the Daily Sport.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

High adventure that's beyond compare?

 

I got some of the Sunlu High Speed PLA that I've been hearing good things about. On the first print I discovered that, while it prints beautifully, it creates a ludicrous amount of dust going through the extruder.

So I open it up to clean it out, when suddenly the tensioning spring shoots out. Searched for about an hour in total, it's nowhere to be seen.

I'd been thinking of replacing the extruder for a dual gear one anyway, so I took the opportunity to order a nice one from Micro-Swiss.

The problem is, that I have an FLSun Q5, and I'd seen from videos online that it doesn't quite sit flush - you need to print a spacer.

So I needed to get the printer patched up for one last hurrah. The spring was salvaged from a broken clothes peg. And it worked perfectly - not just "well enough", but easily as good as the original.

So in summary, if it helps anyone, losing the spring doesn't mean you need a new part - a clothes peg spring works just as well.

209
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by Apepollo11@lemmy.world to c/youshouldknow@lemmy.world
 

I'm seeing a lot of international messages getting this wrong, so this is how you refer to the Prime Minister of the UK.

First, we normally refer to the PM just by name, like anyone else. So, "Keir Starmer" or "Mr Starmer".

"Prime Minister" is not used as a title like "President" is. He's not "Prime Minister Starmer". He's just "the Prime Minister" or "the Prime Minister, Keir Starmer".

Unusually, this new PM is also a knight. Of course, this has its own rules.

If you want to use this title, it's not quite as simple as replacing "Mr" with "Sir'. The first name is more important than the surname here. He's not "Sir Starmer". He's "Sir Keir Starmer" or "Sir Keir".

Hope it helps!

 

Screenshot actually from the film Chand Par Chadayee (1967)

 
 
 
view more: next ›