They lent me a tent, but the one they sent had been bent. I wept, but at least it hadn't been lost in the mail. I'm sure they never meant any harm.
Apepollo11
So kind of like Taming of the Shrew but more so?
Instead of it being a man cleverly trying to win over a woman through manipulation and abuse, it's a woman-hating man cleverly trying to win over a woman through manipulation and abuse?
Even if it did exist, I'm not sure it'd be that watchable. Taming of the Shrew is pretty dubious as it is, but it was written over 400 years ago, so it can be excused somewhat.
Username checks out...
Functionally, in conversation they're the same. But, that said, if I was talking about somebody the listener was close to, I'd use "had died", rather than "is dead".
Why? Because it's slightly less direct, and I'm British so that's the path we take.
Pointing out that someone "is dead" directly alludes to them being a corpse right now. Saying that they "had died" merely references something that they did.
At least he didn't skirt around the issue...
I'm hoping that the Defence absolutely rakes United and other Healthcare providers across the coals, showing all the nasty things they get up to. The high profile of the case will allow this stuff to be laid bare to the masses.
This is where anti-vaxxers sound like.
That’s what antivaxxers sound like.
This. It always baffled me why the BBC legitimises it by including it in the newspaper summaries. Might as well have included the Daily Sport.
High adventure that's beyond compare?
I want to be sympathetic but alarm bells are ringing with the immediate juxtaposition of "that's all fine but I genuinely begin to develop feelings for her" and "I just don't really care all that much for a friendship".
If the issue was that painful to be around her until you can work the feelings out, then that wouldn't be half as bad as saying that she's not worth keeping as a friend if you can't date her.