Trump probably just wants their advice for how to sell it to Christians.
Ava
FFXIV probably deserves a spot on the list, the initial launch was so bad they just remade the game.
I mean... in fairness to Google, wouldn't this be an email address that has almost exclusively emailed a massive chunk of users all at once, without obvious connection, and with exactly identical content? The URL it's sent from doesn't resolve to a webpage, and isn't on the same domain I found attached to other information/copies of the settlement.
That's cool, but I do that too. So don't think you're special, ants!
that the review process “has been activated,” and that the graduate instructor was placed on administrative leave “to ensure fairness.”
In pursuit of fairness, I think it's reasonable to label the Oklahoma University a bigot-friendly institution. Just while the investigation is ongoing, you understand. Certainly this shouldn't be construed as punitive.
I've seen this quote several times, and almost always accompanied by notes that there's not really any evidence he said this.
Also... In 1943 he was probably right, for the kinds of computers he'd have been talking about.
I feel like there was a missed opportunity to call it Androgynous or Androgynix.
These numbers are arranged in decreasing order, but probably aren't directly related. The 39% doesn't inherently encompass the other values, one can dislike his Epstein stuff and his immigration policy, but not his economic stuff.
The latest overall approval/disapproval stats I've seen are somewhere in the ballpark of 40/55% spread. So, your point almost definitely holds for some percentage, but that's not really something that can be interpreted here, you'd need a specific breakdown.
None of what I said is disagreeing with your point. You're reading into my response opposition that wasn't offered.
If you have $1m, you can draw something like $30-40000 a year reasonably safely. That's obviously a lot of money, but isn't what most people in the mentioned countries think of as "living large" if it's your whole income, especially for a couple/family. That puts you at about the median individual income for Japan and NZ, a bit above in Korea, and below for most of western Europe and Aus.
Obviously that's without working, but that's kinda the point. It's wealth, but not enough that most people in those places would be comfortable not working if that's how much they earned. Hell, in the US that wouldn't even cover childcare for a few kids in many locales.
Pretty much. Leave sharing policies are usually set up such that in some sort of extraordinary medical circumstance, employees can transfer paid leave to one another.
The idea is sorta that if a loved one has a major medical emergency and needs a lot of care for 3 months, other employees can transfer paid leave to help cover gaps. This makes sense as a way to cover edge cases in extreme circumstances, but "is having a child" definitely isn't such a case.