Ceedoestrees

Is this whole generalizing and insulting people who disagree with you thing part of another right wing satire?

I wasn't around when it came out, no. Oldish.

There are so many. The best is when the alien rips out of guys' chest and he's like "Oh no! Not again!"

I don't know what point you're arguing. I didn't call it AI and even if I did, I don't know any definition of AI that includes infallibility. I didn't claim it's better than a search engine, either. Even if I did, "Better" does not equal "Always correct."

Former competitive swimmer here. I'm fine with it.

I know you're not going to read it. But what the hell.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jnr.23953

https://www.webmd.com/brain/features/how-male-female-brains-differ

Many differences in performance have more to do with culture. There are smaller talent pools of women for previously male dominated sports because fewer women are interested/supported/encouraged to get into them.

Someone said they didn't enjoy modern satire. You suggested not enjoying modern satire was equivalent to ignoring the issues entirely.

Weird take, considered they didn't say it was bad or wrong, just not their cup of tea.

This smacks of "If you're not with me, you're against me."

Fair point about the difference between good satire and bad. There's always been bad comedy that just points and laughs.

Satire isn't dead, the problem is finding the new extremes. Looking at what's going on and teasing out the ridiculous, improbable hypotheticals without being defeatist. Good satire finds the hope, too, what happens after we get over the wall, and how do we get there.

It's mentally exhausting to keep seeing the hyperbole and not getting the hope.

Mostly, I'm thinking about Spaceballs.

Miniskirts officially become mens wear to avoid a cross dressing scandal.

The Make America Breezy Again campaign is an overnight success.

Red Hats protest H&M for offending anti-trans sensibilities.

It's easier to guestimate the ambient temperature in red states.

Miniskirts now have pockets.

It's mainly this:

I'd like to hear more about this because I'm fairly tech savvy and interested in legal nonsense (not American) and haven't heard of it. Obviously, I'll look it up but if you have a particularly good source I'd be grateful.

I have lawyer friends. I've seen snippets of their work lives. It continues to baffle me how much relies on people who don't have the waking hours or physical capabilities to consume and collate that much information somehow understanding it well enough to present a true, comprehensive argument on a deadline.

I think they’re saying that the kind of people who take LLM generated content as fact are the kind of people who don’t know how to look up information in the first place. Blaming the LLM for it is like blaming a search engine for showing bad results.

Of course LLMs make stuff up, they are machines that make stuff up.

Sort of an aside, but doctors, lawyers, judges and researchers make shit up all the time. A professional designation doesn't make someone infallible or even smart. People should question everything they read, regardless of the source.