[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 72 points 4 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 79 points 5 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 76 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 81 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 85 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 79 points 7 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 72 points 8 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 71 points 8 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 86 points 8 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 81 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It IS perverse. You're having your eyes groped by strangers, all trying to get you to do what you have no desire to do. You just want to get what you came for and leave, but no, everywhere you look something is trying to block your path and distract you from your goal. And it's not even honest: you already know that none of these extraneous, unwanted come-ons you're seeing is anything close to true. In some cases, it's a full-on mental assault.

It's vile. I used to leave some on, but now there's not even such a thing as "acceptable ads" anymore just because of the sheer numbers involved. So now I don't just block: I go full extermination mode. I'm usually on desktop so if it's a one time thing, like a single ad on YouTube that managed to sneak by all of my walls and filters and I can't just pass it by because it's stuck in my field of vision, I'll actually do an "inspect element" and delete it on the spot. But otherwise, if I can't block 100% or very close to it, I find a different site or source, or shut down altogether.

I genuinely don't think our minds were made for this level of constant information onslaught and never-ending manipulation campaigns, and I don't think it's healthy or life-affirming to subject oneself to it without limit. So I don't. People get angry about it, but hey, more for them to enjoy if that's how they wanna roll.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 70 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

He's not wrong. But what he's leaving out is that all this is very rich coming from him personally, a bit of too little too late when he was actually well-placed in 2016 to make a real stand.

It is true that Russell Moore has been speaking out to some extent against Donald Trump for years. But it is also true that when it would have counted most, during the 2016 campaign season, Moore walked back the strength of his anti-Trump statements in order to keep his highly-positioned job as president of the internal ethics board of the Southern Baptist Convention (an organization I consider to be deeply corrupt anyway):

On June 1, 2013, Moore became President of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, the Southern Baptist Convention's official entity assigned to address social, moral, and ethical concerns. . . . [Three years later,] Moore's vocal criticism of then-candidate Donald Trump during the 2016 election season drew a backlash from fellow Southern Baptists, triggering a crisis in which more than 100 churches threatened to withdraw donations to the denomination's Cooperative Program in protest of Moore's stances and leading to calls for his resignation. After Moore issued statements of apology in December 2016 and March 2017 for "using words… that were at times overly broad or unnecessarily harsh," Southern Baptist leaders affirmed their support for his leadership and he remained in his post. (Wikipedia)

It's hard to call upon the rules and be taken seriously when you have not taken the rules seriously yourself:

“No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and wealth." -- Jesus

EDITED TO ADD: I am not a Christian myself, just comparing idolatry to idolatry here.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago

I'm not going back to Reddit.

I'm ESPECIALLY not going back to see u/chtorr and other admins cheat on r/place just because they don't like what someone else did with their master plan for it.

I hope it's covered in protest-themed art they can't erase fast enough. At least that way I'll get a good laugh out of it.

148
Permanently Deleted (gizmodo.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee moved forward a bill called the Cooper Davis Act that would make tech companies report users suspected of criminal drug activity to the DEA.

See also the ACLU position on this bill at https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-condemns-senate-vote-on-bill-forcing-internet-companies-to-spy-on-users-for-the-dea

view more: ‹ prev next ›

ChunkMcHorkle

joined 1 year ago