[-] Contingencyfork@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not paying 4 bucks a month unless it's ad free

[-] Contingencyfork@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago

Can someone explain what COLLA GREENS means in this context? Collared greens?

[-] Contingencyfork@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

Lettuce take a moment.

[-] Contingencyfork@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

I wouldn't worry too much about it whatever the case. Between interpreting a comment as one full of positivity VS one that is potentially sarcastic, I would interpret it as a positive comment 100% of the time. I mean, why not? Thanks for sharing!

[-] Contingencyfork@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

From what I've been reading the past few years, job security for developers doesn't exist beyond the current game they're working on.

[-] Contingencyfork@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

'"You know, we're a platform where you can play Grand Theft Auto but you can also play Palworld. Where you can play Call of Duty and can also play Pentiment. That doesn't change," she said.' - yeah but now I can't play HiFi Rush 2 :(

[-] Contingencyfork@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

Don't forget walking into every bit of wall hoping to find a hidden passage or something

[-] Contingencyfork@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

Yes babies are supposed to be fat. But not from sugar. To the best of my knowledge , when they are older and able to consume solid foods, things like actual fat or butter are fine ( the stuff that clogs arteries etc) but there is no point in a baby's development that requires sugar as a necessity.

So it's not really that the article is based on guidelines for adults and applying it to babies. It's simply that the guideline for babies is that sugar is not necessary and can actually be more harmful than a multitude of other alternatives that can fulfill the same energy requirements of a baby subsistent wholly on milk.

[-] Contingencyfork@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

No you need something pointed.

[-] Contingencyfork@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

Doesn't work. Been there. Still shows.

[-] Contingencyfork@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Honestly I think this is the way to go. You can only avoid it for so long. Rather than trying to stop them it's probably more effective teaching them control and how to navigate this flood of potentially dangerous influences.

[-] Contingencyfork@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Well, China doesn't need to worry as long as they don't attack.

view more: next ›

Contingencyfork

joined 1 year ago