CriticalMiss

They’re not gonna do anything about it for the same reason any other litigious company hasn’t done anything thus far. They’re looking to benefit from AI by cutting costs. If the tech wasn’t beneficiary to these big tech conglomerates they would’ve already sued their asses to oblivion, but since they do care they’ll let AI train on their copyrighted material.

Ah great, horrors beyond my imagination.

Don’t think they’re doing this out of the goodness of the hearts, they’re just trying to avoid the “shit in, shit out” affect of their data sample.

Is this the art of the deal at its glory?

the last sentence is crazy foreshadowing

I was really hoping the last sentence would make it obvious. Oh well.

It’s about efficiency. I can get up in the morning and immediately go brush my teeth. As I’m brushing my teeth I lay my hog on the sink and do the deed. I finish much quicker and get ready for work in about 7 minutes using this strategy.

While at it, we should legalize drunk driving. Drunk driving got a bad name in the past because irresponsible drunk drivers were drinking behind the wheel and purposefully running people over. My father drove drunk for 30 years and he was only in 7 car accidents. It’s non sense.

Yes, I’m fully aware we want to abolish IP law for different reasons but still, I’m onboard.

CalOut

Ubuntu, but good? It’s called Debian.

Can someone tell whoever is leading this project to go with EurOS? Please? Such a missed opportunity.