EABOD25

joined 8 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

No I didn't. You perceived that. So... example

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not from the Midwest, but I wasn't aware there was a stereotype for midwesterners, in a very slight way, you proved my point be discriminating

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee -3 points 1 month ago

And you call them fascist, so i see where your view lies. You're still proving my point

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee -3 points 1 month ago

Noped. You already proved you have no interest in a discussion of opposing views. So you are still proving my point

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Yeah? What's that?

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee -5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Example. Thanks

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee -4 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Another example. Yall are really trying hard to prove point

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

No. Trying to point out the people that get tight in their undies because others have an opposing view or opinion

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee -4 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Why can't there be a Grey area? That's pretty binary for people to be expected to live in a non-binary world

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee -5 points 1 month ago (11 children)

No didn't. You don't know my views. You just assume them and create an idea of how you should talk to me, which ultimately makes you an example of what I'm talking about. Thanks for that

 

I just learned this too. It was never anything I thought about, but some dogs can be trained to hear for situations that a deaf person can't hear. I can't explain why I didn't know or think about this, but it's kind of awesome to me.

They can be trained to notify their person about different alarms and situations that their person might not hear. A good contrast would be a seeing-eye dog for blind people. Dogs are the greatest

Paws With A Cause seems like a good organization to use

 

The Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon is when you never noticed something or saw something before, and then you see it everywhere.

For example say you see a chipmunk in an area you never noticed them before, and now you just see chipmunks everywhere.

0
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by EABOD25@lemm.ee to c/DataBackRibs@lemm.ee
1
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by EABOD25@lemm.ee to c/DataBackRibs@lemm.ee
 

So hear me out. If there's a company that's willing to invest in controlling everything, and is willing and able to handle it at a reasonable cost for the consumer, then it should be allowed. It's not like it's any different today anyway. You have these super corporations that own the smaller corporations that handle various industries. Take Johnson & Johnson for example. They 275 subsidiaries. Meaning that J&J get money for every new product that occurs in the subsidiaries. You don't even know some of the things they're involved with.

And stunning number for a company is Nestlé which has around 2000 subsidiaries. So what's the point of anti monopoly laws anymore? They found a way, so why should they be allowed to hide who they own? The everyday Joe and Jane have already figured out that things aren't the way they appear, so I think we're on the cusp of a full truth era where subsidiaries are going to start being involved in monopolization. These companies skirted the truth for too long, and we as individual citizens should put focus on and shut down subsidiaries

-1
Number of gamers worldwide (www.statista.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by EABOD25@lemm.ee to c/DataBackRibs@lemm.ee
 

By my math, which could be wrong, But around 41% of the world's population consider themselves gamers in some form or fashion

https://prioridata.com/number-of-gamers/#%3A%7E%3Atext=1.61+billion+gamers+worldwide+are%2Cof+the+global+gaming+population.

 

That is all. Carry on

 

Mods, I know what this looks like, but this is legitimately the only place I feel like I can ask this questions. Please don't be mad

view more: ‹ prev next ›