EldritchFeminity

Where have I heard this before?

The Institut für Sexualwissenschaft (Institute for Sexual Science) was an early private sexology research institute in Germany from 1919 to 1933. The name is variously translated as Institute for Sexual Research, Institute of Sexology, Institute for Sexology, or Institute for the Science of Sexuality. The Institute was a non-profit foundation situated in Tiergarten, Berlin. It was the first sexology research center in the world.

The Institute was headed by Magnus Hirschfeld, who since 1897 had run the world's first homosexual organization Wissenschaftlich-humanitäres Komitee (Scientific-Humanitarian Committee), which campaigned on progressive and rational grounds for LGBT rights and tolerance at the start of the first homosexual movement that would flourish in interwar Weimar culture. The Committee published the long-running journal Jahrbuch für sexuelle Zwischenstufen. Hirschfeld built a unique library at the institute on gender, same-sex love and eroticism.

The institute pioneered research and treatment for various matters regarding gender and sexuality, including gay, transgender, and intersex topics. In addition, it offered various other services to the general public: this included treatment for alcoholism, gynecological examinations, marital and sex counseling, treatment for venereal diseases, and access to contraceptive treatment. It offered education on many of these matters to both health professionals and laypersons.

After the Nazis gained control of Germany in the 1930s, the institute and its libraries were destroyed as part of a Nazi government censorship program by youth brigades, who burned its books and documents in the street.

One estimate says that between 12,000 to 20,000 books and journals, and even larger number of images and sex subjects, were destroyed. Another estimate says that about 25,000 books were destroyed.

This included artistic works, rare medical and anthropological documents, and charts concerning cases of intersexuality which were prepared for the International Medical Congress, among other things. A collection of works about sexuality, in any one place, similar to the one stored at the institute was not compiled until the founding of the Kinsey Institute in 1947.

They have to experience the horrors of it firsthand to hopefully get it through their thick skulls why it's a bad thing

This is such a frustrating and consistent issue. Every time I hear a story about a conservative changing their opinion, it's because the consequences of their actions affected them or someone related to them. They can't simply imagine how the consequences will play out or be bothered to care when it hurts their neighbors.

And even then, there's like a 50/50 chance that they'll just blame the Democrats for it and vow to keep voting for Republicans.

Honestly could be a little of column A, a little of column B. Or even the lead, like you mentioned. Lead is one of the leading theories for why there were so many serial killers, but it's also a theory on why the Baby Boomers are so much more conservative than the generations before and after them. Symptoms of long-term lead poisoning include things like heightened aggression, violent tendencies, and impaired cognitive abilities, and the theory also correlates the coincidence of serial killers largely disappearing in the time since lead was banned from gasoline, paint, pipes, etc. - but that also fits for the political stance of generations before and after the introduction and banning of leaded gasoline.

Obviously, there's more to it, but I can't say that I think banning the lead was a bad idea!

Studies have shown that conservatives have smaller areas of the brain related to a sense of empathy on average compared to others. It could be said that they are outright physically less capable of feeling empathy compared to the rest of the population.

First past the post is also forever broken as it inevitably leads to a two-party system.

You're absolutely on the right track. He was literally based on Trump, per the directors.

Here's the version I have that I think is more accurate

Stop simping for Daddy Donald and fascism, he ain't gonna let you suck his toes.

America has never addressed those issues and we've still regressed so much since Reagan was in office. Fuck the US and fuck the Flavor-Aid about "American Exceptionalism" they pour down our throats from the moment we first enter a school. I found the pledge of undying loyalty weird when I was in elementary school, and I don't like it any more 30 years later with all the other things I now know they lied about or swept under the rug.

America has never been great and I have never been proud to be from this country.

One thing I will say about Obama is that he did try. Years ago, somebody put together a list of all his campaign promises and the only one he didn't do anything about was closing Guantanamo Bay. Every other campaign promise said "blocked by Republicans" next to it. People forget that the rest of the government was controlled by a Republican party who said that even in the short time they didn't have majority control that they'd rather burn the government to the ground than let a black man pass any laws. The Democrats capitulating at every like they always do didn't help, of course, but it wasn't like he didn't try to do what he said he was going to.

All the other stuff he did, though? Yeah, that's on him. There was plenty of "business as usual" during his terms when it came to things like drone strikes on civilians and deportation camps.

There have been numerous studies about this, and they have all shown that this doesn't happen. Canada did a multi-year trial with one town in the 2000s (before the program was shut down and the records sealed/destroyed by the conservative administration once they gained power) that showed a drop in workers in only two groups: high-school kids and pregnant women. It also coincided with a general increase in economic activity as well as a sharp increase in both grades in school and the number of kids graduating and going on to college afterward- especially among poor households. The general theory was that the extra money created financial security in poorer households and high-school kids didn't have to work/drop out and get a job to help put food on the table and could therefore focus more on school and have a better chance at going to college and better job prospects in the future, breaking the cycle of poverty.

Y2K is the perfect example of a crisis averted. There was a major problem that would've crashed computer systems all over the world, potentially bringing down power grids, financial institutions, hospital networks, etc. But the problem was identified well ahead of time and programmers and engineers spent like a full year working to ensure that the problem was fixed and wouldn'timpact anything, so it never became A Problem like the media said it was.

Did the Cold War ever really end? I feel like the names of the players may have changed, but the board is still there and the pieces are still moving.