Evinceo

joined 2 years ago
[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 12 points 1 week ago

What's the Rationalist reaction to these developments? Are there any vestigial AI-fearers that haven't switched over to straight up Phrenology like Slatescott and are currently genuinely still worried about the apocalypse because of this?

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 4 points 1 week ago

OSI is gonna mandate that we call it open source now, didn't ya hear?

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Can't people run it locally supposedly?

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 21 points 3 weeks ago

Awesome, I no longer have to link to leaked emails to convince people he's a phrenologist, he just went and wrote a nice succinct article laying it out.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I didn't think today was gonna be a day where I'd read about sounding then breaking glass rods but here we are.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 5 points 2 months ago

Fuck lmfao 🤣

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 3 points 2 months ago

That was way back in 2007. Probably close to when I read his stuff... but even then he was clearly still clinging to the Halloween Letters and seemed extremely old school.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 3 points 2 months ago

Emphasis on used to. He worked fairly hard at becoming a household name, but ultimately his fame was pretty brief. Stallman achieved meme status, love him or hate him. Torvalds actually ships shit people use. There's just no discourse around Raymond these days, good or bad.

Every once in a while someone trips over one of the pitons he's driven into the wall of FOSS to try and climb it, discovers his abysmal takes, amd everyone promptly forgets about him again.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

You're being perhaps too generous to consider ESR a famous FOSS personality.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 4 points 2 months ago

Least insane ESR post

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 3 points 2 months ago

They're gonna ruin cities by further limiting the rights of pedestrians to work around their mediocre programming.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 4 points 3 months ago

Definitely, there was no coming back from that debate.

 

I haven't read the whole thread yet, but so far the choice line is:

I like how you just dropped the “Vance is interested in right authoritarianism” like it’s a known fact to base your entire point on. Vance is the clearest demonstration of a libertarian the republicans have in high office. It’s an absurd ad hominem that you try to mask in your wall of text.

 

The actually not even really a hatchet job NYT piece on SlateScott that mostly just called him a weird little guy has nonetheless created a festering psychic wound that oozes to this day. Here manifests as an interview with the author on LW. See also: discussion on reddit.

My favorite section, talking about how people are mad that be brought up Scott's notorious race stuff™️:

CM: That's great. That's a valid position. There are other valid positions where people say, we need to not go so close to that, because it's dangerous and there's a slippery slope. The irony of this whole situation is that some people who feel that I should not have gone there, who think I should not explore the length and breadth of that situation, are the people who think you should always go there.

 

Hounding the president of Harvard out of a job because you think she's a DEI hire is one thing, but going after a Billionaire's wife? How dare these journalists! What big bullies.

Bonus downplaying of EA's faults. He of course phrases the Bostrom affair as someone being "accused" of sending a racist email, as if there were any question as to who sent it, or if it was racist. And acts like it's not just the cherry on top of a lifetime of Bostrom's work.

 

Utilitarian brainworms or one of the many very real instances of a homicidal parent going after their disabled child? I can't decide, but it's a depressing read.

May end up on SRD, but you read it here first.

 

Someone posted this on ssc with a warning about talking to cops, but really just marvel at what's going on here.

Aaronson manages to turn a story where he is briefly arrested for a theft (which he did commit on video!) into paragraphs and paragraphs of indulging in his persecution fantasies.

Zero empathy on display for the people he stole from, the people just doing their jobs, or reflection on the fact that it wasn't a simple little mistake anyone could make but rather... a fairly weird move? Do people usually put change in cups?

view more: next ›