I'd support a Lemmy-wide ban on posts with pro-advertiser censorship.
Flamekebab
That sounds about where I'm at. I'm happy to spend all day outside and I prefer to be barefoot in general. But I want a bit of floor for sleeping on. Far too many nights spent in perpetually soggy tents!
I detest camping. I've camped in a number of places and it has never been good. I don't care if it's the rolling Mongolian steppe greeting me in the morning, it's still horrible.
I like floors.
Won't someone think of the poor bankers?
It took me a moment to realise this was about inner monologues.
Game development as a service.
Americans: We're very unhappy with the status quo
Dems: Best I can do is more status quo
I'm watching from the sidelines but my gods, you guys need to take your politicians to account. Bricks for the current lot first, mind. The two "sides" aren't equal - one is awful and the other is redefining how bad human beings can be without directly sending people to gas chambers.
Maurice: 'To my right, heh, to everyone's right in fact, we have congressman Alex Shrub; the youngest state congressman to ever be elected by Vice City and now a respected man in the capital. Mr. Shrub got elected because he has great hair and says things that make you nod your head. His campaign appealed to the wealthy because he set all of us at ease by confirming, "It's okay to be rich, as long as you say you care about the children." Mr. Shrub, welcome!'
Alex: 'That's not entirely true, Maurice. My campaign also appealed to the poor... who were too stupid to understand what I'm saying, so I held up pretty pictures and then I gave out candy bars to appeal to their most base insticts.'
I would say that's an apt description for all "conservative" political movements. The only future they're willing to entertain is one that attempts to emulate their idea of the past. It varies by degrees and focus points but ultimately it's an unwillingness to entertain the notion that change is inevitable. The lengths they're willing to take this concept depend on the people involved but ultimately it boils down to what, Peter Pan?
Not the carefree Peter Pan we see in many adaptations but the capricious, arrogant child of the books. One unable to comprehend change and unable to understand consequences. The astounding selfishness and lack of empathy seems to be something these people wear as pride. It's as if they can appreciate the human appreciation for being understood - "that's so me!" without the metacognition to examine what they are beyond that.
I hate being beholden to these overgrown children and their war against reality.
I'm reminded of the scientist paid for by big tobacco in Thank You for Smoking...
Once they've created a society in which no one can or wants to live, what then?
Further distancing us from that bin-fire? Oh no. How awful.