GarbageShoot

joined 2 years ago
[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago (18 children)

"Just pass the test to get on the whitelist, then the whitelist doesn't impact you"

This is like an alternate version of "meritcratic" academic testing, it's still a barrier to people who don't have the same resources as others, which I would dare to assert that is a bad thing.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 13 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Killing people is almost always gratuitous for a fairly-developed country that isn't at war. They should probably be killing fewer people, especially among segments of society more vulnerable than billionaires.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 5 points 7 months ago

I support our rogues, they work hard to circumvent the combat mechanics

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 4 points 7 months ago (20 children)

I don't see it as a restriction on who you can vote for, you can vote for anyone on the committee

Don't give me that. Ultimately the entire thing is meant to restrict candidates to a whitelist, the only question is whether that is a good thing or a bad thing. Saying you can vote for anyone who made the whitelist and therefore the vote is not restricted is silly question-begging and it's below you.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 7 points 7 months ago (25 children)

What I didn't know was that there was a qualification check for local level delegates. Does this qualification check occur multiple times as someone goes up the chain? It seems useful to have in place to ensure someone isn't just charismatic and able to get voted up based on popularity.

Do we support restrictions on who people can vote for? I thought we usually regarded that as a bad thing.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

In a lot of cases (not the people here) it's because they like having a woman they can oggle from every angle and exercise complete control over. See Shaun's most recent video; if it's enough to be a core conceit of reasonably popular video games, it's enough to motivate g*mers in other games that treat their female characters just a misogynistically.

Plenty of people have other reasons, of course.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 27 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

One thing that I'm surprised is being left out is that the admins were doing outreach to various leftist groups, and they were able to get into a conversation with at least a chapter of was one of the more substantial ones (maybe PSL?) who then refused because of the website referencing El Chapo. They rightly decided it would be better for the site's public image to not have that name, and the site had somewhat grown apart from the podcast anyway.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 26 points 7 months ago

It could never live up to that name anyway

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 4 points 7 months ago

I certainly can't help you. I think one thing that is good about therapists is that, even if talking to them doesn't help inherently, they can often use their great amount of knowledge about you to recommend something that might help you more, like psychiatry or support groups.

But people have the ability to change for the better, they always do until they die, and that includes you. As a stranger on the internet, I have no idea how to help you, but I am certain that you can be helped because you're a human who can communicate and take in new information.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah, it's easy in high school and even easier as an undergrad, but there's a precipitous drop immediately after that, at least for me (though I have to imagine it applies to many other people).

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 13 points 7 months ago

In communist China . . .

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Conflating that with people who actively wish death on women is wild.

I was going to say that if you accused me of equivocating, I swear on me mum. The extreme right and the extreme left are both extremes, people who adhere to either are extremists. Extremism isn't an ideology or a value, it's a descriptor of how an ideology relates to the status quo (i.e. being really far away). Unless you meant I was equivocating liberals [on a leftist website] with incels, which would make less sense. I just didn't know you were a lib since almost no one with a HB account identifies that way.

Excuse me?

I should have phrased it more carefully, but I wasn't actually referring to you with that comment. Remember this is all based on you responding to me saying other stuff, there was more context than just us talking, and it's a bad habit of this board (and, admittedly, people in general) to make hasty assumptions about their opposition. I've been getting in trouble with using the general "you" a lot; I need to figure out how to signal things more clearly.

view more: ‹ prev next ›