It's funny to say "only", but if only 38k games were added in 2025, then yeah, that actually is better than I expected. (And still very low, to your greater point.)
3
BAFTA Game Awards 2026 nominations revealed, Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 leads in 12 categories
(www.gamesindustry.biz)
3
Titanium Court honoured with grand prize at IGF awards (All winners listed)
(www.gamedeveloper.com)
Really? I can see it coming out. I just don't see it getting the support it needs to be competitive, much less succeed.
If Infinity Ward's next game includes a DMZ mode and it's good, it will probably determine what I do. I'll probably need a new PC to play it. I've got a 1080 and I'm on Windows 10. I play ARC Raiders with no problem now. But if I have the money, and DMZ2 is fun, and it requires Windows, I'll probably get a new PC with the next Windows. If it doesn't, I'll probably just switch my current PC over to some flavor of Linux, and maybe put that money to a down payment of a house. It'll probably be about the same amount by that point.
A user (whom someone else now banned from LW, I guess,) reported this post for child predation. I get that, given:
a) Roblox only recently putting better communication regulations in place,
b) the multiple states suing them,
c) People Make Games' reporting (which I encourage anyone interested in Roblox to watch.)
But banned-user, you probably won't be surprised to find out that I'm going to let this post stand. Not only because I posted it, but because I do hope that if anyone here is already developing for Roblox, they're able to best take advantage of these programs available to them. And I believe there's a greater chance of that, than a young child finding these posts and considering them inherently a recommendation of Roblox over other development options.
But you be either happy or disgusted to know that I did consider this before the post. I've posted about Roblox before, and made that call.
I think saying that they "bribed the standards body" suggests the body was in on it. The actual allegation (I don't know any facts, just these comments) seems to be that the body was subverted by other countries that were bribed by Microsoft. Being someone who doesn't know the details there's a worthwhile distinction there. Though that still opens questions about the board's reaction, and I might read up on it all later.
Barry is a phenomenal show for film/TV nerds, which you wouldn't expect without someone telling you that.
Like was already said, I'm considering cancelling YouTube Premium too but our numbers won't really matter. The reports of worsening Firefox compatibility almost some me in and I didn't even notice.
I have a family plan with my brother and cousin on it. I know they're cracking down on sharing with people who don't live together, but if they cut them I'm done. I'll figure it out. And I'm probably petty enough to comment about it on everyone's videos that I follow. (Which also won't really matter, but I'll feel better voicing the discontent.)
Yeah. I think if/when it pops, we'll just see Amazon and others use as much of the hardware and real estate as possible to push cloud clients even harder. (To the extent the hardware will work to that end.) And with prices being so high, and often unwilling to go down in a reasonable time, that'll be a bigger issue in the long-term.
And yeah, I just noted the but because it was funny. This community is basically "what's Jeff finding interesting?" anyway. (Though obviously I welcome nearly any post.)
It's so weird. It feels like the anti-AI art sentiment is getting stronger, and yet people continue to double down or even jump into it. I get someone line OpenAI whose entire existence is dependant upon it succeeding... But there are hundreds of AI companies now. How many companies really think they'll be successful enough to be worth it, in a new field that there's growing sentiment against?
It's that kind of thinking that leaves me to think that they're all just chasing a short term stock bump that will obviously hurt them, or provide nothing, long-term.
Side note: I find it funny people are down voting news they don't like. That's fine. I just think it's good to know, even if you're against it.
I haven't released a game. I can only tell you what I've read from others. And that's best summed up as "build a community before release by being social everywhere and honing your game's appeal down to a few images and identifiable words". That isn't very helpful for you; you've read that.
Maybe contact people and sites directly that focus on family friendly content? I don't know how many games do that.
But good luck!
view more: next ›
Trading cards have been around forever, but I gave this thought the other day, and I don't know if they understand the culture has changed.
The casual curiosity that used to exist around baseball cards isn't pervasive around monetary loot boxes and unlocks. I don't think that fun is even there for physical cards anymore. That fun has shrunk back to only a small portion of fans, the very youngest and the extremely niche enthusiasts of any game. Now even casual players and preteens, constantly having ads and full markets shoved in their faces for these things, are avidly into the financial and profiteering aspects that only the most business-minded used to fixate on.
It's like that police charge a month or two ago about the parents that let the small child go to the park alone ahead of them. It used to be accepted, but now less so. It used to be a fun casual excitement to find a rare item. Now it's investments for everyone.
I'm willing to give Valve some benefit of the doubt, that maybe they think a non-trivial portion of people are having fun with this stuff. (I'm sure most will disagree, and that's fine.) But it feels so evident that I feel they must know most are playing the lottery. Knowing or not before now, now they need to come to terms with running a gambling enterprise or remove that aspect entirely.