You know she's vice president right now right?
This article doesn't mention any climate strategy or science, much like Kamala herself. All it talks about is what is politically convenient for her.
What I can gather from this is that if you only care about Blue Team winning, this is great for you, because you can keep your head in the sand, but if you actually care about climate change, this is bad, because there is no commitment of any kind from Kamala. (And being a smart person, I will assume the absolute worst from her, based on history.)
sow division
The evil Ruski plot to get people to disagree about whether slaughtering children and raping hostages is bad.
There is no division to be sown here. If someone is on the evil side of this issue, that's entirely their own personal failing. And all major political parties of all major Western countries agree on being pro-genocide. So who do you think he's trying to sow division between?
Me not voting for a genocider is much more of an accomplishment than a policy that pushed the timing of doomsday back 2 hours.
$1200
Yeah, I'm gonna demand some record of how much each of the other people are paying in rent/payments. "Financially stable" is really sus here.
An apartheid state seems pretty hostile to me.
Mr. Biden, welcome to the resistance.
I too love the justice system that never falsely imprisoned anyone or arrived at verdicts for political reasons haha lol such a noble and righteous institution hehe xD yes
Solve the inequality
Yeah, that's what we're trying to do.
I Drive the Bus That is Running Over Thousands of Palestinians Every Day. Here's Why That's a Good Thing:
In this essay, I will-
By the way, in case anyone misses it: the bottom of her own graph explains the yellow line isn't even what climate scientists agree on what is necessary, it is only what the Biden campaign claimed they were going to achieve. The actual climate goals set by any committee of experts you can find is actually much lower.
So this graph tells you 1) Biden didn't plan on doing anything worthwhile, and 2) he was lying about it anyways.
I can tell you're one of those people that claims there is a "cycle of violence", but there is no cycle. There is no circular causality. Israel's genocide is not caused by violence from Palestinians. It is caused by an ethno-nationalist ideology and the colonist invasion used to implement it. Every bit of violence that you will associate with a Palestinian is a justified response to being trapped, starved, beaten, deprived, and killed.
Palestinians do not do anything to cause the continued violence of Israel. If Hamas completely dissolved and no Palestinian child ever threw a rock at an Israeli tank again, they would still be getting genocided, having their homes and land continually taken from them. Because Israel and most of its citizens want this to happen. No, "we" don't need thousands of people to die. Israel needs it.
Kumikommunism
joined 4 years ago
lmao. What the fuck do you think the role of a figurehead is? The administration she's a part of is currently engaging in genocide, and she has not said one critical word. In fact, she can't even bring herself to use the word "genocide". She is fully supportive of the genociders and helped Biden spread Islamophobic lies about the victims. If she's a figurehead and isn't an islamophobic genocide-lover, she has a weird way of showing it. If you are in her position and not calling for Biden to cease bombing arab children, you are complicit.
Oh and that's ignoring the fact that you are obviously being disingenuous and she's the presidential nominee taking the place of a president stepping down. "Just a figurehead". Literally the second most powerful position in the administration, and running to be the most powerful.
Edit: let me quote you to you, so we can be clear on how much of a moron you are:
You think this makes sense, but you think Kamala is a smol widdle bean who can't do anything. That's what kind of moron you are.