It's obvious you were waiting for someone to finally say abortion so you could respond with that.
If women are dying because of laws denying them medical care that could have easily saved their lives, that is the definition of not protecting women.
How come Syria has to protect women, but US federal and state governments don't?
Gym Crush: Is anyone using this?
Me: No, and the machine is available too.
Petty Officer First Class is an Enlisted rank.
They'll be my hero if the movie ends in 15 minutes after everyone dies of dysentery.
So they could have done it all along?
"Hey, our wholesale costs went up 300%, so we raised it 400% because fuck you, we're all doing it and you don't have any other options " is still price gouging and collusion.
At the rate we're going, it's always too soon.
I'm currently in the AF. Can confirm, we're a snapshot of the country. Not some frothing red dog.
I live in korea and recently visited Japan. Both countries are wonderful to visit.
Went to Tokyo and Kyoto, the touristy spots were very busy. As long as you're polite and respect Japanese social "rules", it's fine. And there's plenty of other places to visit if Kyoto is too contentious right now.
Korea also has a lot to offer in Seoul and Busan. It's a short few hours and reasonably priced high speed train between the two cities.
Plenty of other countries in the region to visit as well.
view more: next ›
LastWish
joined 7 months ago
It's hard to perceive your "what do you mean?" as genuine, especially considering it wasn't a vague reference. I think you could have asked, "Do you only mean abortion or is there something else?" and communicated your points in a less passive-aggressive "trap" framework.
Additionally, the original point only stated US governments are not protecting women, which is true regardless of your stance on abortion, regardless of the intended target of the law and regardless if it was intentionally targeting, "a war on", women.