MLRL_Commie

joined 1 year ago
[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 13 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Interesting! I used the Persian letter to make it, but using taa and shiin makes sense too. But it sound very funny, and now I'm seeing so many Bahrain videos! Do they say it for الله اتشبار too??

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 17 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (4 children)

Is the Bahrain accent one that makes Kaf an English CH sound??

"شوف الچالب يهربو"

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 23 points 8 hours ago

shahed

What a sight that is

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 10 points 10 hours ago

Also suspicious of this one, yeah

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 17 points 10 hours ago

!اُصروب !اُصروب!اُصروب!اُصروب

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Yeah I typed way too fast before and was fixing it when you posted lol

I learned Lebanese and never was good at writing FusHa lol

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

إن شاء الله

inshallah-script

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 25 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (4 children)

My Arabic isn't great, but that I do know. He was yelling 'Hit' in the command form: اُضروب!

In this case, clearly cheering it on

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 47 points 14 hours ago

Exactly how I felt when I finally opened hexbear after like 15 hours away. Goddamn the US and Zionist Entity

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Theoretically, would you have considered it well-handled with it if a representative for Davidson had apologized for the harm instead of he himself giving it?

I'm not trying to rehash the arguments already made, I'm just trying to understand what the best course of action is to protect all harm to oppressed groups generally. And it seems to me that Davidson going onto the stage to say "I'm so sorry for the tic and didn't mean it" also wasn't the right move (for many reasons, including that the harm could've been accidentally repeated and that it would be harmful to his mental health to need to do that on such a huge stage). This solution in the long-term would require always having someone around Davidson to perform this act if needed, which has practicality issues... But it's the best I can think of until we have a world where people understand the harm of racism and TS separately and as they (unintentionally) intersect.

I think I'm looking for such a solution because a lot of the analogies about 'saying sorry when you didn't mean to or couldn't control it' miss the quantity->quality dialectic. From what I've gathered, this would be a major impact on his life to apologize consistently for things he doesn't want to do but come out anyways. If it were once a week (like most analogous examples stated here seem to me), I don't think there would be as strong of feelings against a required apology. But it seems that this could be a 'multiple times per hour' thing, which just is an entirely different situation. The harm to others is equivalent and directly related to the amount it happens, but the harm to himself is likely not linear and become exponential once it takes up more than 1/10 of his day to explain himself and apologize.

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 8 points 6 days ago

Nothing to add, just glad to be here for this one. Gonna send it to the party chat and see if we can put it on some propaganda posters for fartin or somethin

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Lol "China and India" sounds like "China and Albania" to me. "China + Scranton" feels just as true

 

Edit2: the ratio is amazing. I'm exhausted. This has quadrupled my hexbear time for the day and I will be limiting myself for a bit lol. I feel like we got somewhere in a couple of good threads thanks to Hellinkilla and ratboy. Good luck, comrades.

Edit: the rant wasn't clear enough. In Previous struggles users have expressed frustrations with how mods/admin decisions are made. I would like to discuss how they are made and hear from them. Mods have also stated before that they wish we could be better, I'd like to hear how and know how they think this should be approached.

Rant/effort post coming:

What's the follow up to the recent problems with how mods/admins have handled recent issues? Did I miss something? Can we get some explanations about how this site is structured and what roles we see for admins/mods generally?

history of struggle session, not necessary but gives context


We had a fairly large and fairly one-sided struggle session a couple weeks ago. Z_Poster was banned (and still is, as far as I know) and the emoji was added. Some users (thinking of @hellinkella, smong others) did some effort to really parse out where the pain points were and who was involved (largely Zionism inherent in some positions, Jewish exceptionalism). Only the emoji and banning occurred with no other promises/ideas from mods/admins.

There then followed a leak of mod logs where opinions were still very different than the userbase. I would encourage people not to open it or ask for it, please, and especially not to share it. But I think a significant amount of us did see messages that, regardless of context, gave an image of admins/mods that think the userbase hates them, disagreed with the userbase in significant ways, and which wants to steer us in a better direction. The mod chat was also absurdly active at the time, but there's been little talk about what WAS discussed, only discussions about what was missed, where more context is needed, and things that were not done in a timely manner. This was not further discussed. (Personally I'm super appreciative of you all, doing work I don't want to do on a website I enjoy thoroughly, and don't hate any of you--including previous ones I've argued with, but would like to see some changes which will follow below and hopefully other comrades will add to it/change it for the better).

We had an EM/POC post which was tangential to that, but where there seemed to be large support for the userbase with regards to the ideological differences between mods/admins and the broader userbase. There was also a banning for which apologies followed quickly, but which indicates the structural failure more generally. There were of course other topics covered, which I won't speak on here. I didn't see any solutions proposed and accepted, from any of the topics relevant to this post. (Please correct me if I read this thread wrong, don't want to speak for you, EM/POC comrades.)

Was there a follow up? Is that coming? Is the discussion behind the curtain of the mod chat? I understand you all have lives, so don't spend all your time working on this, but some knowledge of how you're working would be good. Otherwise it feels like purposeful pushing back of feedback/decisions so that we will forget the passionate feelings or give up. If that's the goal, it's a horrible strategy and should just be explicitly told. "3 months after a struggle session is the earliest we will make changes in processes" is better than nothing.

I would also recommend we have an open discussion about the direction of the site. It seems the mods/admins have indicated to have better ideas for what we can be (I remember this from the "dunk" discussions too), but have not made clear what their position in that is. Enforcers? A vanguard (with our input as leading determinant)? A different vanguard (against our input for but in our interests)? Theoreticians that have the ideas but want the users to take the lead? Knowing this would make clearer how to interact with you, and how to make our experiences better. Maybe we do need growth and improvement, but we haven't been clear about how, and talking down is how most have experienced that. I already love this place, so when I'm frustrated I don't think of leaving. But that's not universal

 

I'm no expert on Iran, so I was hoping some knowledgeable people here could give some context. I find it hard to figure out the speaker's exact strategy from the discussion. Any thoughts?

view more: next ›