MasterDeeLuke

I despise the words disinformation and misinformation with every fiber of my soul.

Honestly it's pretty impressive how Iran has been able to pinpoint and take out the US's most irreplaceable assets. Losing things THAADs and AWACS is a very painful loss that weakens the US globally.

Let us cheer and rally for the downfall of monarchs like the good old times.

ONE OF US SOUTH KOREA! ONE OF US!

Yep, there is a reason the Gulf states are so hesitant to get directly involved, empowering their own trying domestic militaries will lead to a Gaddifi couping their asses and Iran knows it. Their paper thin rule depends on material wealth to keep their populations placated and for the US to act their as their personal bouncers.

The most insightful thing Canadians researchers could teach on the subject is how the Soviets could of correctly and successfully done genocide instead if that was their goal.

"Hey ChatGPT, bomb the homes of Iranian leadership."

It's possible we'll see a lot US aircraft getting down as Iran figures out what works and what doesn't. There is a lot more room for Iran to adapt to F35s than there it is for the US to adapt and change their F35s.

At this point Japan is more likely to invade and attack Taiwan then China. You can guarantee their imperial nostalgic government isn't going to be happy about seeing a former colony they still see as theirs' choosing to reunite with China and they will make up whatever bullshit they can.

Naturally Marxist Leninists are going to hold at least an ounce of distain for "welfarism" due to the way the bourgeoisie have historically used welfare to placate the masses into accepting a temporary band aid rather then actually seizing power for themselves. That's not the same thing as opposing welfare in principle the way conservatives and reactionaries do, unless you're advocating for an extreme degree of welfare that ignores material reality.

Hormuz blocked means fuller storage tanks, fuller tanks means more strikes on tanks, less tanks means less storage, less storage means means oil producers completely ceasing operations sooner.

Yes, it would, but the alternative is the US invading and taking over Cuba with minimal consequences. The US government and military establishment have spelled it out in a crystal clear fashion they are on global crusade to purge socialism militarily and they should be taken at their word as much as Hitler should of when he wrote his thoughts about the bolsheviks in Mein Kampf. And it pains me to say it but Nuclear weapons are truly the only viable defense in Cuba's case. Cuba doesn't have the robust ballistic missile and drones manufacturing that Iran has and a committed attack by the US would be extremely one sided. We can talk about the Bay of Pigs and Vietnam but the factors aren't identical. The Bay of Pigs was a suicide incursion done by rabid Gusanos that the US merely supported rather then an actual US military campaign, Vietnam had a steady stream of supplies and support from China and the USSR to keep them fighting into perpetuality. The best leverage Cuba has would be to strike shipping and oil assets in the Gulf but again they lack the missiles and drones to do that like Iran can.