[-] Michaelmitchell@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

He probably won't make it out of Florida. Florida is the place where east coasters go to retire so it's full of 70 year old retirees. Them combined with venezuelan and cuban migrants who are rabidly anti-communist give him a solid fat right block that supports him in all this stupidity. Good thing is that you don't see those conditions outside of Florida where the average person is mildly disgusted by most of it.

[-] Michaelmitchell@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

You could argue the opposite, genocide would be guiding reproduction away from diversity.

[-] Michaelmitchell@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Just started timberborn and it seems to be in this vain. It's a beaver city builder and you have to manage the river with dams to survive droughts, along with the typical food, water and energy resource management.

[-] Michaelmitchell@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

I sort of agree with this, no one uses that bike lane to commute. The bridge itself is 4 miles and there gonna be another couple of miles of hills and suburbs on either side before you get to anything. We shouldn't just make it another car lane though, imo we should keep up the barriers and make it a bus only lane during the morning. The bridge is theoretically a great transit corridor as there's unconnected regional rail on both sides, along with ferry terminals, it's just those buses always get stuck in traffic. That way Everybody wins, the bicyclists can just strap there bike to the front of the bus and only have to ride the last mile, people who can't ride a bike but want a faster commute out of traffic can take the bus then hop on one of the regional trains, the cars can sit in their soul crushing traffic and watch a bus whiz by and realize the error of their ways.

[-] Michaelmitchell@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No one does cycle to commute there though, the bridge itself is 4 miles and then there's another couple miles of hills and suburbs before you get to where you want to go. Very few people are willing to do a 8+ mile commute on bike every morning. That doesn't mean that lane should just be another car lane though, imo they should keep the barriers up and make it a bus only lane during the morning. Everybody wins, the bicyclists can just strap there bike to the front of the bus and only have to ride the last mile, people who can't ride a bike but want a faster commute out of traffic can take the bus, the cars can sit in their soul crushing traffic and watch a bus whiz by and realize the error of their ways.

[-] Michaelmitchell@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Also it assumes the increase in consumption from needing more calories will be uniform when my guess is it's not. Most people would have two servings of meat a day as a base augmented by a bunch of starches, sugars and fats to cover most of the calories, and any increases would probably be snacks of those starches and sugars that are way less co2 per calorie. If your diet is a stereotypical cheeseburger and fries, and your still hungry, your probably not gonna order another 1/4 cheeseburger and 1/4 fries, you'll probably just get another order of fries.

[-] Michaelmitchell@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

To prevent anti-trust suits. There's a reason meta never bought Twitter even though it could many times over, they'd be brought to court for having the top three social media platforms. If they were going to enter this space they needed something to point to and say they aren't a monopoly.

[-] Michaelmitchell@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

No, it never worked. The examples are web browsers, email and java, all of which remain open standards. There's a reason Google doesn't try this shit even though they own a large portion of the email and browser market, because they know it'll just piss people off and bring them in front of a judge for anti-competitive behavior and ultimately do nothing.

[-] Michaelmitchell@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago

There's a general, well founded, distrust of meta. Theres a general theory going around that they will embrace, extend and extinguish the fediverse. It will ride the wave of federation then when it gets large enough it will defederate or add some dumb feature that will break all compatibility. The problem with this strategy is it will bring them in front of a court for anti-conpetitive behavior, just like what happened to Microsoft every time it tried to do this, and possibly break up the whole company as instagram might get shaved off too. There's a reason Google doesn't try to do this with chrome or gmail, they learned it's a bad strategy from Microsoft. The reality is the fediverse as it stands right now is a blip to meta, a blip they can point to and say they aren't a monopoly, but just a blip, not some radical existential threat that needs to be destroyed.

[-] Michaelmitchell@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Meta does not want to "consume the fediverse" , it's not worth it. Threads has been up for a day and it already has 10x the number of active users than mastodon. Mastodon and the fediverse as it currently stands, is a blip compared to instagram and Twitter. They're doing activitypub so they can claim there's a free market and avoid any anti-trust litigation for owning the three largest social media platforms. If that means a relatively small number of people stay on mastodon instead of threads that's a small price to pay.

[-] Michaelmitchell@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Maybe not in Lemmy but on mastodon individual users can block domains.

[-] Michaelmitchell@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

And open them up to anti-conpetitive and monopoly law suits? Meta has already been getting calls to be broken up for having the top two social medias, if they get the full trifecta then they're gonna have a tough time selling defederation to the FTC or E.U. Better for them to take 90% of the pie and allow others to fight over the scraps then try for full 100% and risk litigation.

view more: next ›

Michaelmitchell

joined 1 year ago