158
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They didn't seem terribly useful, compared to other long projects.

  • Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
  • Guide reproduction wisely – improving fitness and diversity.
  • Unite humanity with a living new language.
  • Rule passion – faith – tradition – and all things with tempered reason.
  • Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
  • Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
  • Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
  • Balance personal rights with social duties.
  • Prize truth – beauty – love – seeking harmony with the infinite.
  • Be not a cancer on the Earth – Leave room for nature – Leave room for nature.

Basically, a freethinker version of the Ten Commandments tablets.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The listed weights and dimensions are the most useful things to me. Knowing the approximate weight of a kilogram and length of a meter would be incredibly useful when trying to recreate things you find in records

[-] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Openly advocating genocide and eugenics? Yeah, definitely not what I would call useful

[-] gbuttersnaps@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

If you read "Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity" as eugenics and genocide, I think you might be jumping the gun a bit based on personal biases. Population bottlenecks require you to be very careful about species-wide gene pools. In a population of 10,000, you don't want Cletus reproducing with his first cousin.

[-] Neato@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure it was

Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

You can't maintain a population like that without birth restrictions, slaughter, or restricting resources. And this is humanity we're talking about. The ruling class/ethnicity will prioritize their own making genocide an all but certain outcome.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm gonna have to go digging for the source, I'll edit it once I find it. The creator of the guide stones wanted his identity protected but people found out who he was. Dudes real big into eugenics, it's 100% telling people to do Eugenics and not at all concerned with population bottlenecks

Edit: could've sworn I'd read an article about it but it was apparently this episode of last week tonight.

TL;DW: it's not 100% confirmed who the person that commissioned the guide stones is but it's likely Dr. Herbert Kirsten, a man who was very outspoken in his support.for David Duke.

[-] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

The only way you get a "population bottleneck" of 500 million from our current 8 billion is genocide. Even the world population in 1980 when these were erected was 4.5 billion. Still would have required genocide.

"Guiding reproduction" is definitely a euphemism for eugenics. Don't be naive.

[-] warling@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Or nuclear near-annihilation, which was a definite concern when these were erected. Or a pandemic.

[-] ElleChaise@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

That's the part everybody seems to be glossing over. These stones were supposed to be read by a burgeoning society post apocalypse, not our current world with 8 billion people. The non-existent world these stones speaks to would contain presumably less than the 500,000,000 people its author states is the maximum, and acts as a warning along the lines of ‘don't destroy the Earth's environment like we did, that's what lead to our downfall, too many people’. Not to say that take is correct or not, just what I thought when reading about the stones the first time. Seems like environmentally political rhetoric to me.

[-] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Imagine believing in a world where 90% of the human population is annihilated by some calamity, and the survivors have the psychological capacity to focus on anything other than basic survival and repopulation.

Utopian fantasyland. Believing things like this requires deliberate ignorance of the nature of human beings and pretty much all of human history. It's magical thinking

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Especially since these were put up in the 1980s.

If it were 20-30 years earlier, you'd write it off as Cold War/MAD Nuclear doomerism combined with that very particular breed of American fascism that inspired the Strangelove/Fallout aesthetic. People believing they could put the "best and brightest" down in bunkers to recreate an even better world after the inevitable collapse, without all those "undesirable" cultural elements polluting things.

But this was 1980. The Cold War was clearly ending. CFCs were still little-known as a global threat. The fossil fuel companies were still VERY effectively hiding the reality of climate change from the general public. The recession wasn't clearly visible yet. There was no reason to be a doomer. That was a great time to be an optimist.

[-] Montagge@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I'll take nature over 7.5 billion people including myself. What we've done to this planet is shameful and never should have gotten to this point.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah that's eugenics, guy. Eugenics loves dictating who can and cannot reproduce based on potential genetic factors passed to their offspring. Kind of the cornerstone.

The guy who built the Guidestones was very likely a KKK fan. Doesn't deserve much benefit of the doubt.

[-] eltimablo@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

So it's eugenics to say that incest is bad?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Michaelmitchell@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

You could argue the opposite, genocide would be guiding reproduction away from diversity.

[-] some_guy 24 points 1 year ago

Conspiracists attributed nefarious intent on these stones. I learned about them from a podcast that studies conspiratorial thinking. I didn't realize they'd been destroyed. I kinda think I heard that ep after the time when they were bombed, so maybe that was mentioned and I didn't internalize it.

Heads-up: conspiracy people are potentially dangerous. They blew up these stones that were probably pretty trivial / harmless. They have shot people for perceived great-replacement bullshit (synagogs). This shit isn't just amusing and stupid. They're irrational and they can project and cause harm.

[-] lemmycolon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

An entertaining watch on the Guidestones prior to its destruction: https://youtu.be/AEa3sK1iZxc

The supposed creator was a fan of David Duke of the KKK…

[-] Jackolantern@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago
[-] SparkleWagon@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

It was bombed, as some people in our society deemed it "satanic".

[-] derpo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Post-2020 republican doomerism

Source: I live nearby

[-] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

These had their version of the Ten Commandments in eight languages. I suppose it was bombed because mah gud.

[-] radix@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

If they were meant to survive nuclear apocalypse, then why did one small non-nuclear bomb bring them down? You'd think they should be better constructed or protected or something.

[-] Anaphylactic_Gock@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 year ago

Elbert County, Georgia. A county with about 20k people in it.

They didn't need to withstand a direct hit. Just the fallout/nuclear winter that would kill most of humanity.

[-] radix@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I see. I guess odds were pretty low that a nuclear bomb would lay waste to a rural town.

As an aside, I wonder why they used so many languages if the nuclear winter survivors would have been rural Georgians like the ones who built the monument. I don't imagine a Russian survivor would ever find themself in the American Deep South without functional airplanes and such.

[-] Anaphylactic_Gock@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

The extra languages are probably to help it act as a sort of rosseta stone to help future archeologists.

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

They were quite likely put up by folks that believed the same wack job shit as those that destroyed them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Roundcat@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have mixed feelings on this monument. The parts recommending eugenics is not cool, but some of the messages like living with nature and valuing truth are important. Sadly, it was probably the encouraging of universalism, tempering with reason, and the living with nature that the religious terrorists took issue with.

I can't say I morn the loss of the monument entirely, but the fact a more or less secular monument was destroyed for religious reasons kinda feels haunting. Kinda reminds me of the Taliban destroying the ancient statues of Buddha in Afghanistan.

[-] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

From what I’ve read on Wikipedia, this monument was poorly thought-out, but very well designed and rather badly executed. No major loss, in that case.

[-] Shurimal@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Good riddance for probably wrong reasons. Shame they plan to rebuild this crap. Guidestones for thinly veiled eugenics and genocide, they were. Blergh.

[-] Ostrichgrif@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Are they rebuilding them? I live somewhat nearby and last I heard there were no plans to rebuild the stones. Do you have a link to that?

[-] Shurimal@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

In late July 2022, Elberton Mayor Daniel Graves said the town planned to rebuild the monument exactly as it was, adding "We're just getting geared up and excited about rebuilding them.

From the linked Wikipedia article.

[-] Ostrichgrif@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh wow can't believe I hadn't heard about that, thanks!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
158 points (94.4% liked)

Creepy Wikipedia

3885 readers
33 users here now

A fediverse community for curating Wikipedia articles that are oddly fascinating, eerily unsettling, or make you shiver with fear and disgust

image

Guidelines:
  1. Follow the Code of Conduct

  2. Do NOT report posts YOU don't consider creepy

  3. Strictly Wikipedia submissions only

  4. Please follow the post naming convention: Wikipedia Article Title - Short Synopsis

  5. Tick the NSFW box for submissions with inappropriate thumbnails.

  6. Please refrain from any offensive language/profanities in the posts titles, unless necessary (e.g. it's in the original article's title).

Mandatory:

If you didn't find an article "creepy," you must announce it in the thread so everyone will know that you didn't find it creepy

image

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS